2.7 sec in total
59 ms
2.5 sec
215 ms
Click here to check amazing Roark Fencing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about roarkfencing.com
Roark Fencing is dedicated to our customers and we aim to provide high-quality work. Give us a call today for all of your fencing needs!
Visit roarkfencing.comWe analyzed Roarkfencing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 59 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
roarkfencing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value7.9 s
3/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value1,300 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.678
8/100
15%
Value14.3 s
9/100
10%
59 ms
27 ms
34 ms
40 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Roarkfencing.com, 11% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (323 ms) belongs to the original domain Roarkfencing.com.
Page size can be reduced by 88.9 kB (11%)
793.3 kB
704.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Roarkfencing.com main page is 793.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 341.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roark Fencing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roarkfencing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (92%)
71
6
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roark Fencing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.roarkfencing.com
59 ms
ct-preloader.css
27 ms
ct-reset.css
34 ms
ct-grid.css
40 ms
style.css
48 ms
style.css
43 ms
ct-header.css
56 ms
ct-widgets.css
58 ms
ct-new-css.css
71 ms
ct-perevazka-css.css
64 ms
css
35 ms
custom.css
72 ms
ct-avx-custom.css
65 ms
js_composer.min.css
91 ms
ct-additional-blog-1.css
86 ms
ct-hovers.css
75 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
82 ms
ct-vc_elements.css
109 ms
style.min.css
85 ms
ct-js_composer_columns.css
106 ms
basic.min.css
108 ms
theme-ie11.min.css
106 ms
theme.min.css
113 ms
ct-settings-init.js
110 ms
ct-fullwidth-loader.js
122 ms
jquery.min.js
125 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
136 ms
jquery.json.min.js
135 ms
gravityforms.min.js
134 ms
utils.min.js
212 ms
js
58 ms
css
31 ms
animate.min.css
216 ms
icons-elegant.css
219 ms
rs6.css
211 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
233 ms
ct-menu_init.js
217 ms
svg4everybody.js
242 ms
ct-form-elements.js
242 ms
jquery.easing.js
226 ms
ct-header.js
217 ms
ct-lazyLoading.js
212 ms
jquery.transform.js
210 ms
effect.min.js
201 ms
effect-drop.min.js
189 ms
odometer.js
191 ms
ct-sticky.js
295 ms
functions.js
188 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
182 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
179 ms
jquery.fancybox-init.js
175 ms
ct-vc_elements_init.js
228 ms
rbtools.min.js
297 ms
rs6.min.js
292 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
251 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
250 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
249 ms
dom-ready.min.js
296 ms
hooks.min.js
293 ms
i18n.min.js
291 ms
a11y.min.js
291 ms
jquery.textareaCounter.plugin.min.js
279 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
278 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
323 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
297 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
271 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
169 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
190 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
220 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OWaA.ttf
218 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISWaA.ttf
219 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSWaA.ttf
209 ms
wAPeNpjYGRgYOABYjEgZmJgBMIGIGYB8xgACR4ArwAAAAEAAAAA1CSYugAAAADVg9b2AAAAANWD124AAVleJu8AAA==
40 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
221 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
239 ms
logo_e9a599f317037655af272d18dbb6b68c_1x.jpg
214 ms
preloader-1.gif
286 ms
dummy.png
273 ms
Aluminum-Fence-by-Roark-Fencing-500x423.jpg
263 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rm.ttf
79 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoUoOmb2Rm.ttf
80 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rm.ttf
81 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
155 ms
roarkfencing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
roarkfencing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
roarkfencing.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roarkfencing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roarkfencing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roarkfencing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roark Fencing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: