Tools & Wizards About Us
robertjamescollection.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

robertjamescollection.com

Custom Furniture For The Design Industry | Robert James Collection

Page Load Speed

976 ms in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

751 ms

Page Rendered

125 ms

robertjamescollection.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Robert James Collection content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about robertjamescollection.com

ROBERT JAMES COLLECTION finishes are created with full understanding of the material. White Oak, Walnut, and Iron are all gifts from nature, and each finish is artfully applied to enhance their unique...

Visit robertjamescollection.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Robertjamescollection.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 876 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

robertjamescollection.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.4 s

56/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

robertjamescollection.com

100 ms

robertjamescollection.com

132 ms

robertjamescollection.css

100 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

129 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Robertjamescollection.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Assets.pinterest.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn-images.mailchimp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (216 ms) belongs to the original domain Robertjamescollection.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 962.9 kB (32%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Robertjamescollection.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 72.8 kB

  • Original 90.6 kB
  • After minification 84.4 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 72.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 340.2 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Robert James Collection needs image optimization as it can save up to 340.2 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 435.1 kB

  • Original 617.4 kB
  • After minification 601.5 kB
  • After compression 182.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 435.1 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 114.8 kB

  • Original 140.9 kB
  • After minification 116.4 kB
  • After compression 26.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Robertjamescollection.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 114.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (31%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robert James Collection. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

robertjamescollection.com

robertjamescollection.com

100 ms

robertjamescollection.com

robertjamescollection.com

132 ms

robertjamescollection.css

robertjamescollection.css

100 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

129 ms

jquery.fancybox.min.css

jquery.fancybox.min.css

106 ms

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

modernizr-2.8.3.min.js

106 ms

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

jquery-1.9.1.min.js

168 ms

jquery-plugins.js

jquery-plugins.js

167 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

216 ms

robertjamescollection.js

robertjamescollection.js

141 ms

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js

163 ms

pinit.js

pinit.js

15 ms

classic-10_7.css

classic-10_7.css

18 ms

mc-validate.js

mc-validate.js

42 ms

logo.png

logo.png

29 ms

Home_Page_196.jpg

Home_Page_196.jpg

105 ms

Home_Page_197.jpg

Home_Page_197.jpg

96 ms

Home_Page_198.jpg

Home_Page_198.jpg

95 ms

Home_Page_199.jpg

Home_Page_199.jpg

103 ms

Home_Page_200.jpg

Home_Page_200.jpg

92 ms

Home_Page_201.jpg

Home_Page_201.jpg

80 ms

Home_Page_202.jpg

Home_Page_202.jpg

107 ms

facebook_32.png

facebook_32.png

115 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

122 ms

houzz-button.png

houzz-button.png

122 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

129 ms

googleplus_32.png

googleplus_32.png

132 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

134 ms

email.png

email.png

138 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

144 ms

slide3.jpg

slide3.jpg

145 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

159 ms

slide5.jpg

slide5.jpg

161 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

163 ms

pinit_main.js

pinit_main.js

6 ms

site-search-icon.png

site-search-icon.png

31 ms

icn_search2.png

icn_search2.png

31 ms

home-alt.jpg

home-alt.jpg

32 ms

Lato-Regular-webfont.woff

Lato-Regular-webfont.woff

64 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

32 ms

Lato-Bold-webfont.woff

Lato-Bold-webfont.woff

72 ms

Accessibility Review

robertjamescollection.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

robertjamescollection.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

robertjamescollection.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Robertjamescollection.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Robertjamescollection.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

robertjamescollection.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Robert James Collection. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: