1.4 sec in total
149 ms
1 sec
204 ms
Click here to check amazing Robertshoward content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about robertshoward.com
Just going along in life and searching for the will of God...
Visit robertshoward.comWe analyzed Robertshoward.com page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
robertshoward.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value4.1 s
47/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value3.6 s
91/100
10%
149 ms
31 ms
45 ms
42 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Robertshoward.com, 10% (10 requests) were made to Scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (356 ms) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.9 MB (56%)
3.3 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Robertshoward.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Robertshoward images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 477.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Robertshoward.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 477.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (68%)
96
31
The browser has sent 96 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robertshoward. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
robertshoward.com
149 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
31 ms
style.css
45 ms
links.css
42 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
tc_common.min.css
53 ms
yellow.min.css
42 ms
style.css
45 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.css
63 ms
social-logos.min.css
64 ms
jetpack.css
67 ms
jquery.js
76 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
65 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.min.js
91 ms
tc-scripts.min.js
94 ms
photon.js
89 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
30 ms
gprofiles.js
18 ms
wpgroho.js
91 ms
comment-reply.min.js
91 ms
core.min.js
145 ms
modernizr.min.js
149 ms
effect.min.js
176 ms
facebook-embed.js
178 ms
wp-embed.min.js
177 ms
postmessage.js
180 ms
jquery.jetpack-resize.js
180 ms
queuehandler.js
180 ms
google-translate.js
181 ms
element.js
35 ms
sharing.js
188 ms
e-201736.js
26 ms
gtm.js
88 ms
cropped-250x100_the_things_a_handicapped_man_ponders.png
213 ms
cropped-250x100_the_things_a_handicapped_man_ponders-1.png
212 ms
sdk.js
105 ms
plusone.js
150 ms
widgets.js
80 ms
glyphicons-halflings.png
92 ms
Things_a_Handicapped_Man_Ponders_Large...-1.jpg
356 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
91 ms
sdk.js
55 ms
translateelement.css
76 ms
main.js
113 ms
97 ms
82 ms
master.html
103 ms
hovercard.css
29 ms
services.css
28 ms
button.3ccb64e61d4c01fae12cd2b0ed9b2bab.js
72 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
43 ms
0sTQzbapM8j.js
66 ms
share_button.php
150 ms
page.php
317 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
39 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
57 ms
fastbutton
155 ms
g.gif
33 ms
element_main.js
47 ms
jquery.js
51 ms
translate_24dp.png
65 ms
l
37 ms
cleardot.gif
100 ms
postmessageRelay
132 ms
translate_24dp.png
51 ms
tweet_button.f8c8d971a6ac545cf416e3c1ad4bbc65.en.html
45 ms
4qFiRLLPSF7.js
112 ms
uPlIYLfynqH.png
94 ms
te_ctrl3.gif
42 ms
rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA
33 ms
postmessage.js
27 ms
jed.js
65 ms
underscore.min.js
68 ms
971028622-postmessagerelay.js
62 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
61 ms
jot
151 ms
jquery.wpcom-proxy-request.js
8 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
3 ms
119 ms
WRYTpCDr6V4.css
4 ms
f9mGsFoKGRJ.js
13 ms
JrFVMrRpAYB.js
13 ms
T-D_V7C7Ph6.js
53 ms
likes-rest.js
54 ms
16142392_1407517569282114_6590338233776489786_n.jpg
79 ms
13607053_1209892739044599_1478784535207238772_n.jpg
143 ms
15740756_10209571175690477_4415150093857224864_n.jpg
61 ms
20952990_1618265671559378_8886542625953982183_n.jpg
61 ms
16299125_1694749967452403_8050742637894711092_n.jpg
62 ms
17353434_121771815020604_3958518991653439267_n.jpg
62 ms
20155711_497696000576491_2260117214772908246_n.jpg
64 ms
20994366_360329954401844_5293608842183568134_n.jpg
76 ms
12495094_373655042804805_5314853900570245394_n.jpg
62 ms
20429585_10159007211860328_4413855332601461018_n.jpg
62 ms
wMkwmq5_RAN.png
17 ms
8 ms
batch
73 ms
robertshoward.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
robertshoward.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
robertshoward.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Robertshoward.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Robertshoward.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
robertshoward.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Robertshoward. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: