Access roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com. Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.5 s

72/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value720 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.294

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

48 ms

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

59 ms

boise.js

35 ms

abilene.js

36 ms

style.css

32 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com, 9% (9 requests) were made to M.media-amazon.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Z-na.amazon-adsystem.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (501 ms) belongs to the original domain Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com.

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 680.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 139.8 kB

Original 179.9 kB
After minification 179.8 kB
After compression 40.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.8 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

Original 680.7 kB
After minification 679.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 130.0 kB

Original 481.6 kB
After minification 481.6 kB
After compression 351.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 130.0 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

Original 46.7 kB
After minification 42.1 kB
After compression 40.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.5 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Robotic Pool Cleaners Compared

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

boise.js

abilene.js

style.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

roboticpoolcleanerscompared.com

boise.js

abilene.js

style.css

style.min.css

aalb_basics.css

form_style.css

go_pricing_styles.css

screen.min.css

rounded-thumbs.min.css

tablepress-combined.min.css

tablepress-responsive.min.css

jquery.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

modernizr-2.0.6.min.js

scripts.js

TweenMax.min.js

q

js

onejs

onejs

snippet.affilimate.io

onejs

1.2.2

comment-reply.min.js

go_pricing_scripts.js

front.min.js

frontend.min.js

jquery.datatables.min.js

js

adsbygoogle.js

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

style_reset.css

flexslider.css

elastislide.css

style_main.css

style_667.css

style_480.css

style_414.css

style_375.css

style_320.css

style_768.css