4.5 sec in total
1.1 sec
2.2 sec
1.2 sec
Welcome to robservatory.com homepage info - get ready to check Robservatory best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about robservatory.com
Robservations on everything…
Visit robservatory.comWe analyzed Robservatory.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
robservatory.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
63/100
10%
Value5.1 s
26/100
25%
Value6.9 s
33/100
10%
Value950 ms
29/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
1077 ms
135 ms
132 ms
91 ms
108 ms
Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Robservatory.com, 20% (21 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 9% (10 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Robservatory.com.
Page size can be reduced by 378.1 kB (46%)
827.0 kB
449.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Robservatory.com main page is 827.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 304.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 73.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 73.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Robservatory images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 158.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 158.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Robservatory.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 142.7 kB or 73% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (67%)
99
33
The browser has sent 99 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Robservatory. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
robservatory.com
1077 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
135 ms
prettyPhoto.css
132 ms
common.css
91 ms
selective.css
108 ms
style.css
107 ms
css
23 ms
genericons.css
136 ms
style.css
160 ms
responsive.css
164 ms
style.css
177 ms
style.css
179 ms
style.css
179 ms
style.css
212 ms
genericons.css
213 ms
jetpack.css
264 ms
jquery.js
309 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
225 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
271 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
272 ms
jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js
273 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
307 ms
jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js
337 ms
jquery.cycle2.video.min.js
337 ms
script.js
336 ms
script.js
338 ms
client.js
350 ms
photon.js
225 ms
sf.js
227 ms
sf_selective.js
228 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
59 ms
nav-toggle.js
227 ms
wp-embed.min.js
228 ms
widgets.js
80 ms
sharing.js
233 ms
e-201609.js
6 ms
gx8.jpg
90 ms
a6000.jpg
91 ms
internet_radio_s.jpg
90 ms
wLo0d0rY_mini.jpeg
673 ms
lavalamp.jpg
69 ms
a6300.jpg
70 ms
lollipops_lowqual.jpg
73 ms
lollipops_tunnel_lowqual.jpg
71 ms
the_grid.jpg
71 ms
show_radio.png
70 ms
bit_rates.png
71 ms
siri_art.jpg
72 ms
header_nebula_5_mirrored_small1.jpg
74 ms
mag_glass.png
74 ms
rss.png
75 ms
loading.gif
73 ms
teknik-regular-webfont.woff
594 ms
teknik-bold-webfont.woff
595 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsNxB8OB85xaNTJvVSB9YUjQ.woff
65 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nPZRQUbYfRc-1FWT9T9EE8M.woff
66 ms
Genericons.svg
595 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
5 ms
WyXtbLelkv62W9rJf1sl7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7ohV7RK3pFr+gVvaJX9Ipe0St6tV6tV+vVerVerVfr1Xq1Xq3X6DV6jV7T9Yr3qXifivepdPIfY1AvlQABUnNepwAA
4 ms
ZS0wkeOZuckNE3boyLYNt6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.woff
587 ms
UnXpojilM3XslYxUnWuVe3YhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.woff
592 ms
thecommitted.png
578 ms
share
162 ms
g.gif
41 ms
graph.facebook.com
197 ms
share
154 ms
graph.facebook.com
274 ms
share
157 ms
graph.facebook.com
280 ms
share
178 ms
graph.facebook.com
295 ms
share
150 ms
graph.facebook.com
293 ms
share
141 ms
graph.facebook.com
293 ms
share
152 ms
graph.facebook.com
289 ms
share
187 ms
graph.facebook.com
327 ms
share
150 ms
graph.facebook.com
340 ms
share
179 ms
graph.facebook.com
351 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
189 ms
g.gif
96 ms
g.gif
97 ms
g.gif
102 ms
g.gif
102 ms
g.gif
101 ms
g.gif
102 ms
g.gif
102 ms
g.gif
104 ms
g.gif
106 ms
g.gif
108 ms
g.gif
105 ms
g.gif
105 ms
g.gif
107 ms
g.gif
109 ms
g.gif
110 ms
g.gif
110 ms
g.gif
109 ms
g.gif
111 ms
g.gif
111 ms
g.gif
31 ms
follow_button.6a78875565a912489e9aef879c881358.en.html
44 ms
info.json
106 ms
robservatory.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
robservatory.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
robservatory.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Robservatory.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Robservatory.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
robservatory.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Robservatory. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: