Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

rocarm.com

Rocarm

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

726 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

136 ms

rocarm.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rocarm content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rocarm.com

Visit rocarm.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rocarm.com page load time and found that the first response time was 726 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rocarm.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

70/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rocarm.com

726 ms

fse11.css

465 ms

rocarm_Rsmall.gif

464 ms

bstrbu2.gif

237 ms

home_cmp_blocks110_vbtn_p.gif

237 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rocarm.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (726 ms) belongs to the original domain Rocarm.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.8 kB (83%)

Content Size

23.8 kB

After Optimization

4.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Rocarm.com main page is 23.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 13.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 8.6 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 9.4 kB
  • After compression 2.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 11.1 kB

  • Original 13.0 kB
  • After minification 10.1 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rocarm.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (73%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocarm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rocarm.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

rocarm.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rocarm.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rocarm.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rocarm.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rocarm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: