1.7 sec in total
26 ms
912 ms
774 ms
Visit rockcontent.com now to see the best up-to-date Rock Content content for Brazil and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rockcontent.com
A Rock Content capacita marcas para lançar as melhores experiências de conteúdo, usando nossos melhores produtos e serviços.
Visit rockcontent.comWe analyzed Rockcontent.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
rockcontent.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value13.3 s
0/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value2,610 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
26 ms
264 ms
33 ms
26 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Rockcontent.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Obs.roundprincemusic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (326 ms) relates to the external source Tag.clearbitscripts.com.
Page size can be reduced by 268.3 kB (24%)
1.1 MB
857.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Rockcontent.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 620.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 256.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 256.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rock Content images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockcontent.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (69%)
81
25
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rock Content. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rockcontent.com
26 ms
rockcontent.com
264 ms
rock-widgets-base.css
33 ms
frontend.css
26 ms
style.min.css
29 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
135 ms
post-19.css
26 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
41 ms
post-64160.css
43 ms
post-64154.css
45 ms
post-64151.css
46 ms
script.min.js
58 ms
jquery.min.js
64 ms
frontend.js
64 ms
rockAnalytics.js
69 ms
7fe874ab8c2ddfb2725c2014fbcf3af2.js
21 ms
tags.js
326 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
53 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
23 ms
email-decode.min.js
5 ms
post-64098.css
15 ms
post-64081.css
20 ms
post-64090.css
18 ms
post-64101.css
29 ms
post-64093.css
32 ms
animations.min.css
34 ms
355484.js
34 ms
rock-menu-and-switcher.min.js
235 ms
v2.js
233 ms
rock-lang-popup.min.js
37 ms
wp-embed.min.js
39 ms
rock-tabs.min.js
46 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
51 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
52 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
52 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
232 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
233 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
234 ms
hooks.min.js
234 ms
i18n.min.js
235 ms
frontend.min.js
234 ms
waypoints.min.js
276 ms
swiper.min.js
276 ms
frontend.min.js
216 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
257 ms
preloaded-modules.min.js
257 ms
jquery.sticky.min.js
257 ms
lazyload.min.js
256 ms
vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015
256 ms
gtm.js
227 ms
j.php
225 ms
rock-bg-hero.png
117 ms
Rock-content-marketing-content.png
118 ms
rock-bg-2-1.png
118 ms
font-inter-regular.woff
108 ms
font-inter-bold.woff
108 ms
ct
206 ms
font-manrope-bold.woff
108 ms
font-manrope-regular.woff
105 ms
fb.js
108 ms
355484.js
161 ms
banner.js
106 ms
feedbackweb-new.js
120 ms
conversations-embed.js
108 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
105 ms
collectedforms.js
114 ms
v.gif
71 ms
tag-9e5d164aa925a3d7b1539c4e5510af0e.js
59 ms
wa-interface.png
56 ms
WA_New-logo_FINAL-byRock-e1675244592484.png
59 ms
rock-content-ion-1.png
59 ms
Logo-Ion-1.png
56 ms
Image-4-1.png
56 ms
Logo-Stage.png
57 ms
rock-content-ion-1.png
76 ms
rock-content-visually-min.png
68 ms
rock-content-stage.png
65 ms
rock-content-studio-1.png
222 ms
squareicon_arrow.svg
65 ms
squareicon_pencil.svg
63 ms
squareicon_report.svg
79 ms
rock-content-custom-gallery.png
77 ms
Rolf-Inge-Holden.png
80 ms
Drew-Bailey.png
85 ms
Jessie-Coan.png
91 ms
settings.js
11 ms
tc_imp.gif
6 ms
tracker
36 ms
settings.js
24 ms
rockcontent.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rockcontent.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
rockcontent.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockcontent.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockcontent.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rockcontent.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rock Content. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: