6.3 sec in total
2.4 sec
3.7 sec
199 ms
Visit rocket.com now to see the best up-to-date Rocket content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rocket.com
Aerojet Rocketdyne
Visit rocket.comWe analyzed Rocket.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rocket.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value20.8 s
0/100
25%
Value10.1 s
9/100
10%
Value400 ms
68/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
2425 ms
57 ms
152 ms
154 ms
155 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Rocket.com, 21% (16 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 13% (10 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rocket.com.
Page size can be reduced by 805.1 kB (52%)
1.6 MB
748.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Rocket.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 658.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 70.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rocket needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 451.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 451.2 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 260.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rocket.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 260.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (39%)
64
39
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocket. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rocket.com
2425 ms
egs8zup.js
57 ms
css_Z_KQyXTcIGmFPRfGZOOTJ1xsEckXlqMhF53CkTgnOVA.css
152 ms
css_k_2IVAahyzFNwBWy64BrzdpXCxkiLPNv8kO39cHx5xk.css
154 ms
css_XRS9Ne9XmJUvQXKijhF-2HOyka0iDi9i39JFgvpKgKA.css
155 ms
css_FmNri3fClV08mbiFcqtbYlAPZQhKPUmoMn8-BuiKMHY.css
156 ms
js_3jHghlMLrjr9xXAC0JufqSSch3oAbkZstSqYdc4uuck.js
227 ms
js_8YnKEH2191h1uW2SekzE955HmAgGcbHvObibmduei6w.js
271 ms
lightbox.js
448 ms
js_rPflTrFDR7VWS-EpdfKO7IoEuwRhk89Q5zf0VFEAuAY.js
319 ms
js_WybzNln1QYHpe_WSdL_0aD0qyHG3JOHuC8bAD663oYM.js
523 ms
d
238 ms
ga.js
29 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
bg.png
165 ms
bg-header.png
301 ms
nav-border.png
163 ms
icon-button-blue.png
163 ms
bg-main.png
398 ms
menu-leaf.png
164 ms
feature-6.jpg
398 ms
feature-3_1.jpg
398 ms
AM_FrontImage_1_0.jpg
462 ms
feature_slider_SLS.jpg
398 ms
feature-5_0.jpg
539 ms
bg-sub.png
686 ms
bg-sub-column.png
541 ms
icon-facebook.png
539 ms
icon-twitter.png
542 ms
icon-linkedin.png
612 ms
icon-youtube.png
686 ms
widgets.js
77 ms
bg-footer.png
597 ms
loading.gif
598 ms
arrows.png
598 ms
bullets.png
669 ms
bg-input.png
745 ms
E1eH94RoANI
141 ms
oZwAAA
26 ms
v+Ru451cc0RmpAA==
24 ms
8EDYQhZwAAAA==
24 ms
v+Ru451cc0RmpAA==
23 ms
zDLbHHPNM98CCy2y2BJLLbNcthVWWmW1NdZaZ70Ncmy0yWZbbA2nvD2c+k677LbHXvvsd8BBhxx2xFHHHHfCSaecluuMs84574KLLoWbc8VV1+S57oabbrkt3x13FbjnvkIPFHnokWKPPfHUM8+98NIrr73x1jvvffgJ4OFt9wAAAA==
22 ms
X723I+h98+AoZk7RL
23 ms
pPc4mjvTyMl4kJdKIzXehKN7rLgZ70ojd96CuT+suHgbIpiUEMLp7lv9fvbcj6H3z4ChmTtEs=
22 ms
1+9tyPoffPgKGZO0Sw==
22 ms
CJqAAAA
23 ms
wiagAAAA==
22 ms
timeline.1b43d11859b7663a2225b885f87704a5.js
45 ms
p.gif
141 ms
syndication
114 ms
494566802861477888
212 ms
www-embed-player-vflQrT_sR.css
71 ms
www-embed-player.js
93 ms
yrK4EqpSRdoujKQmsJoZ5WaLgeULvcWnibQMQSxOOnM.js
58 ms
ad_status.js
102 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
128 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
129 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
17 ms
timeline.4d087f49a21e27038d9769d7c976b8fa.default.css
19 ms
blH3qQuU_normal.jpeg
165 ms
dhjmucIe_normal.png
171 ms
y_KkqkrD_normal.png
180 ms
nasawatch.twitter_normal.jpg
183 ms
DhqkN2yb_normal.png
182 ms
DQr0-29p_normal.jpg
185 ms
47dfe63982c71d75a788ecca8dd99438_normal.jpeg
187 ms
FPAcB8KV_normal.jpeg
197 ms
zvKDJUvj_normal.jpeg
206 ms
Cca1kM5UcAARZIN.jpg:small
209 ms
Ccas1PAUcAAI60z.jpg:small
208 ms
CcapBOWW0AALDNq.jpg:small
212 ms
CcZaGX9VAAAGuEr.jpg:small
212 ms
CcLE-3aVAAAfaAX.jpg:small
225 ms
CcKv6YGUMAAq-nN.jpg:small
233 ms
CcBaEQ1WoAAxEeA.jpg:small
261 ms
jot
27 ms
rocket.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rocket.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
rocket.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rocket.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rocket.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rocket.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rocket. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: