Tools & Wizards About Us
rocketfailover.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

rocketfailover.com

RocketFailover™ - Versatile Plans for Any Business Size

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

388 ms

rocketfailover.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rocketfailover.com homepage info - get ready to check Rocket Failover best content right away, or after learning these important things about rocketfailover.com

Our diverse plans offer simple, backup Internet for c-stores, retail stores, restaurants, franchises & multi-location businesses to keep operations running 24/7.

Visit rocketfailover.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rocketfailover.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rocketfailover.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,020 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rocketfailover.com

164 ms

compare

307 ms

css2

36 ms

css-min-bundle.css.v638611391346442972

106 ms

css-bundle.css.v638611391346442972

162 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rocketfailover.com, 57% (25 requests) were made to Akative.com and 16% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (412 ms) relates to the external source Akative.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 226.3 kB (22%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

795.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rocketfailover.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 418.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 86.8 kB

  • Original 100.5 kB
  • After minification 78.4 kB
  • After compression 13.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.0 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 8.4 kB

  • Original 362.5 kB
  • After minification 354.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rocket Failover images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 418.2 kB
  • After minification 418.2 kB
  • After compression 328.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 140.8 kB
  • After minification 140.8 kB
  • After compression 99.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rocketfailover.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (42%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rocket Failover. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rocketfailover.com

rocketfailover.com

164 ms

compare

compare

307 ms

css2

css2

36 ms

css-min-bundle.css.v638611391346442972

css-min-bundle.css.v638611391346442972

106 ms

css-bundle.css.v638611391346442972

css-bundle.css.v638611391346442972

162 ms

js-jquery-bundle.js.v638611391346442972

js-jquery-bundle.js.v638611391346442972

212 ms

js-bundle.js.v638611391346442972

js-bundle.js.v638611391346442972

412 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

222 ms

aspnet-validation.min.js

aspnet-validation.min.js

223 ms

js

js

129 ms

css2

css2

21 ms

css2

css2

19 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

355 ms

akative-logo-v1.svg

akative-logo-v1.svg

155 ms

rf-comparison-headerimg-1920x630.png

rf-comparison-headerimg-1920x630.png

165 ms

autopilot-device-255x234-2.png

autopilot-device-255x234-2.png

157 ms

fusion-device-255x234.png

fusion-device-255x234.png

155 ms

completesecurity-device-255x234.png

completesecurity-device-255x234.png

156 ms

4gcoverage-icon-100x87.png

4gcoverage-icon-100x87.png

154 ms

datapoolingicon-100x87.png

datapoolingicon-100x87.png

178 ms

istatus-icon-100x87.png

istatus-icon-100x87.png

175 ms

securearchitecture-icon-100x87.png

securearchitecture-icon-100x87.png

175 ms

support-icon-100x87.png

support-icon-100x87.png

169 ms

caas-960x300.jpg

caas-960x300.jpg

282 ms

akative-logo-v1white.svg

akative-logo-v1white.svg

243 ms

Footer-Award-Logos.png

Footer-Award-Logos.png

245 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

173 ms

bat.js

bat.js

73 ms

WidgetScript

WidgetScript

129 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

43 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

67 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

113 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

114 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

114 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

114 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf

114 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

254 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

160 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

130 ms

Flaticon.svg

Flaticon.svg

161 ms

Flaticon.woff

Flaticon.woff

193 ms

5726487.js

5726487.js

46 ms

5726487

5726487

40 ms

0.7.45

0.7.45

30 ms

Accessibility Review

rocketfailover.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rocketfailover.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rocketfailover.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rocketfailover.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rocketfailover.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rocketfailover.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rocket Failover. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: