3.2 sec in total
570 ms
2.3 sec
283 ms
Click here to check amazing Rockfordpack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rockfordpack.com
Visit rockfordpack.comWe analyzed Rockfordpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 570 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
rockfordpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.6 s
31/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value15.4 s
1/100
10%
Value6,890 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.296
40/100
15%
Value25.8 s
0/100
10%
570 ms
51 ms
128 ms
74 ms
74 ms
Our browser made a total of 161 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (139 requests) were addressed to the original Rockfordpack.com, 4% (6 requests) were made to Static.olark.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (570 ms) belongs to the original domain Rockfordpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 375.2 kB (26%)
1.4 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rockfordpack.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 732.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rockfordpack needs image optimization as it can save up to 132.1 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 109.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 109.4 kB or 25% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockfordpack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 136 (89%)
153
17
The browser has sent 153 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockfordpack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 124 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rockfordpack.com
570 ms
calendar.css
51 ms
styles-m.css
128 ms
main.css
74 ms
owl.carousel.css
74 ms
owl.theme.css
78 ms
magnific-popup.css
77 ms
default.css
74 ms
owl.carousel.css
97 ms
rs6.min.css
98 ms
styles-l.css
103 ms
require.js
163 ms
mixins.js
102 ms
requirejs-config.js
122 ms
custom.js
123 ms
css2
49 ms
js
69 ms
js
123 ms
font-awesome.min.css
54 ms
css
28 ms
loader.js
154 ms
RPS-Logo.png
55 ms
custom-design-experts.png
117 ms
local-farmer_1.png
345 ms
local-farmer.png
346 ms
button-slice-normal.png
55 ms
Llyod-founder.png
114 ms
jquery.js
112 ms
common.js
109 ms
dataPost.js
110 ms
bootstrap.js
113 ms
form-key-provider.js
112 ms
mage-translation-dictionary.js
62 ms
theme.js
291 ms
autocomplete.js
297 ms
typeahead.js
296 ms
customer-data.js
231 ms
analytics.js
90 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
72 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0C4n.ttf
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
108 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
124 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
109 ms
Luma-Icons.woff
180 ms
PhosphateInline.woff
187 ms
domReady.js
186 ms
app.js
46 ms
template.js
184 ms
confirm.js
183 ms
widget.js
184 ms
jquery-migrate.js
186 ms
main.js
185 ms
bootstrap.js
318 ms
text.js
320 ms
jquery-mixin.js
315 ms
collect
17 ms
8661-614-10-3995.js
33 ms
collect
18 ms
ga-audiences
58 ms
c
100 ms
application2.js
98 ms
smart-keyboard-handler.js
185 ms
mage.js
186 ms
ie-class-fixer.js
185 ms
underscore.js
182 ms
knockout.js
188 ms
section-config.js
181 ms
url.js
182 ms
jquery.storageapi.extended.js
183 ms
storage.js
180 ms
storage-mixin.js
180 ms
storage-mixin.js
180 ms
translate.js
148 ms
modal.js
149 ms
version.js
41 ms
knockout-es5.js
35 ms
wrapper.js
33 ms
js-translation.json
32 ms
jquery.cookie.js
42 ms
jquery.storageapi.min.js
42 ms
storage-sequence.js
41 ms
registry.js
42 ms
modal-popup.html
33 ms
modal-slide.html
34 ms
modal-custom.html
35 ms
key-codes.js
37 ms
core.js
39 ms
z-index.js
41 ms
scripts.js
45 ms
engine.js
44 ms
bootstrap.js
52 ms
observable_array.js
53 ms
bound-nodes.js
81 ms
storage.html
24 ms
storage.js
28 ms
data.js
62 ms
disable-selection.js
62 ms
focusable.js
63 ms
form.js
63 ms
ie.js
63 ms
keycode.js
63 ms
labels.js
62 ms
jquery-patch.js
60 ms
plugin.js
61 ms
safe-active-element.js
67 ms
safe-blur.js
67 ms
scroll-parent.js
67 ms
tabbable.js
67 ms
unique-id.js
68 ms
knockout-repeat.js
58 ms
knockout-fast-foreach.js
161 ms
observable_source.js
135 ms
renderer.js
136 ms
console-logger.js
136 ms
resizable.js
136 ms
i18n.js
137 ms
scope.js
137 ms
range.js
137 ms
mage-init.js
137 ms
keyboard.js
138 ms
optgroup.js
137 ms
after-render.js
139 ms
autoselect.js
139 ms
datepicker.js
138 ms
outer_click.js
138 ms
fadeVisible.js
144 ms
collapsible.js
144 ms
staticChecked.js
220 ms
simple-checked.js
219 ms
bind-html.js
219 ms
tooltip.js
219 ms
color-picker.js
213 ms
events.js
213 ms
visits
175 ms
class.js
28 ms
local.js
27 ms
async.js
26 ms
main.js
28 ms
logger.js
27 ms
entry-factory.js
27 ms
console-output-handler.js
37 ms
formatter.js
37 ms
message-pool.js
33 ms
levels-pool.js
38 ms
logger-utils.js
48 ms
loader.js
48 ms
spectrum.js
58 ms
tinycolor.js
63 ms
tooltip.html
50 ms
dom-observer.js
47 ms
bindings.js
54 ms
arrays.js
52 ms
compare.js
57 ms
misc.js
58 ms
misc-mixin.js
60 ms
objects.js
60 ms
strings.js
72 ms
template.js
72 ms
entry.js
72 ms
moment.js
73 ms
print.css
26 ms
rockfordpack.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[role]s are not contained by their required parent element
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
rockfordpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
rockfordpack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockfordpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockfordpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rockfordpack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockfordpack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: