6.8 sec in total
277 ms
5.2 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Rockingham content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rockingham.co.uk
A 250-acre site with planning for end-to-end automotive processing, with storage capacity for 50,000 vehicles and 40,000 sq ft of office space.
Visit rockingham.co.ukWe analyzed Rockingham.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rockingham.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value6.9 s
6/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value5.1 s
75/100
10%
277 ms
1835 ms
157 ms
134 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rockingham.co.uk, 83% (89 requests) were made to X6p0m2znsyp2doo0jl3h6i736.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source X6p0m2znsyp2doo0jl3h6i736.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (8%)
17.7 MB
16.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rockingham.co.uk main page is 17.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 15.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 110.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 110.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 75.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rockingham images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 862.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 862.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 400.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rockingham.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 400.4 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (71%)
89
26
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rockingham. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 45 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rockingham.co.uk
277 ms
www.rockingham.co.uk
1835 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
157 ms
css
134 ms
css
159 ms
styles.css
24 ms
cli-style.css
42 ms
settings.css
34 ms
mediaelementplayer.min.css
42 ms
wp-mediaelement.css
38 ms
rgs.css
37 ms
font-awesome.min.css
38 ms
steadysets.css
43 ms
linecon.css
45 ms
style.css
56 ms
responsive.css
48 ms
eventon_styles.css
76 ms
eventon_dynamic_styles.css
70 ms
css
84 ms
font-awesome.css
77 ms
default.min.css
73 ms
tablepress-responsive.min.css
75 ms
jquery.js
79 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
77 ms
cookielawinfo.js
78 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
78 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
77 ms
modernizr.js
75 ms
api.js
73 ms
js_composer_front.css
20 ms
core.min.js
28 ms
widget.min.js
27 ms
position.min.js
15 ms
menu.min.js
21 ms
autocomplete.min.js
16 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
30 ms
jquery.form.min.js
30 ms
scripts.js
29 ms
superfish.js
31 ms
imagesLoaded.min.js
31 ms
easing.js
38 ms
respond.js
38 ms
swipe.min.js
35 ms
nicescroll.js
37 ms
sticky.js
41 ms
prettyPhoto.js
40 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
39 ms
isotope.min.js
47 ms
carouFredSel.min.js
48 ms
appear.js
46 ms
init.js
53 ms
blog-masonry.js
51 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
52 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
306 ms
nectar-slider.js
306 ms
comment-reply.min.js
305 ms
nectar-love.js
308 ms
twitter-tweets.js
307 ms
js_composer_front.js
307 ms
eventon_script.js
309 ms
eventon_gen_maps.js
308 ms
js
309 ms
eventon_init_gmap.js
309 ms
webfont.js
33 ms
analytics.js
155 ms
logo-with-r.png
109 ms
Nascars1-website.jpg
2377 ms
corperateevents1.png
536 ms
venueinformation1.png
109 ms
Open-Days-600x403.jpg
534 ms
Kumho-BMW-600x354.jpg
528 ms
British-GT-20163-600x403.jpg
1037 ms
Shedden2-600x403.jpg
532 ms
Press-release-pic.jpg
530 ms
British-GT-2016.jpg
1135 ms
birthday-new-website.jpg
1040 ms
twitter_image.jpg
1039 ms
rockinghampopup-BG1-700x443.jpg
1041 ms
tiny_time_icon.png
942 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1029 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
1024 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1029 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
1021 ms
OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff
1464 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
1266 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1265 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
1179 ms
icomoon.woff
1262 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1462 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
1262 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
23 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
58 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
110 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
110 ms
collect
90 ms
jquery.min.js
481 ms
overlay.png
543 ms
Summer-social-photo-for-web-fbno-logo.jpg
768 ms
trackdayheader.jpg
838 ms
Bushell-testing.jpg
886 ms
exhibtionsheadersed1.jpg
1714 ms
nectar-loading.gif
657 ms
diagonal_line.png
837 ms
widget_v2.135.js
98 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
716 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
52 ms
collect
96 ms
rockingham.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rockingham.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rockingham.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rockingham.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rockingham.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rockingham.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rockingham. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: