Tools & Wizards About Us
rodew.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

rodew.com

Responsive Website Design & Hosting - Rodew Web Services, Halifax-Dartmouth, Nova Scotia

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

135 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

314 ms

rodew.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rodew content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rodew.com

Affordable Responsive Websites, Logo Design, Hosting & Domain names. We start the concept with you, help you build the content and ensure your online presence gets the attention it deserves.

Visit rodew.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rodew.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rodew.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.054

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rodew.com

135 ms

slauenwhite.ca

1006 ms

bootstrap.css

61 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

123 ms

template.css

112 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rodew.com, 82% (77 requests) were made to Slauenwhite.ca and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Slauenwhite.ca.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 255.5 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rodew.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 50.6 kB

  • Original 63.1 kB
  • After minification 59.7 kB
  • After compression 12.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 97.0 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rodew images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 102.6 kB

  • Original 280.3 kB
  • After minification 280.2 kB
  • After compression 177.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 102.6 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 102.4 kB
  • After minification 102.4 kB
  • After compression 97.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rodew.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (51%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

39

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rodew. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rodew.com

rodew.com

135 ms

slauenwhite.ca

slauenwhite.ca

1006 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

61 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

123 ms

template.css

template.css

112 ms

megamenu.css

megamenu.css

109 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

116 ms

custom.css

custom.css

119 ms

home.css

home.css

121 ms

stylecss.php

stylecss.php

175 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

168 ms

rightcss.php

rightcss.php

175 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

173 ms

style.css

style.css

170 ms

owl2.carousel.css

owl2.carousel.css

170 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

226 ms

style.css

style.css

231 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

229 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

241 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

242 ms

jquery-noconflict.min.js

jquery-noconflict.min.js

239 ms

modal.min.js

modal.min.js

281 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

288 ms

jquery.tap.min.js

jquery.tap.min.js

283 ms

script.js

script.js

285 ms

menu.js

menu.js

298 ms

moduletitle.js

moduletitle.js

297 ms

styleswitcher.js

styleswitcher.js

337 ms

nav-collapse.js

nav-collapse.js

339 ms

sidepanel.js

sidepanel.js

340 ms

JFlickr.js

JFlickr.js

345 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

349 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

365 ms

jquery.owl2.carousel.js

jquery.owl2.carousel.js

394 ms

theme.js

theme.js

402 ms

lightbox-plus-jquery.js

lightbox-plus-jquery.js

401 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

404 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

64 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

8 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

368 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

433 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

426 ms

ss-block.min.js

ss-block.min.js

424 ms

logo.png

logo.png

94 ms

Harold-Dave-Shirley.jpeg

Harold-Dave-Shirley.jpeg

296 ms

paws.png

paws.png

119 ms

small-slauenwhite-crest.png

small-slauenwhite-crest.png

94 ms

2.png

2.png

95 ms

3.png

3.png

95 ms

dogs.jpg

dogs.jpg

295 ms

4.png

4.png

132 ms

5.png

5.png

292 ms

6.png

6.png

295 ms

7.png

7.png

295 ms

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_80.jpg

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_80.jpg

379 ms

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_81.jpg

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_81.jpg

386 ms

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_82.jpg

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_82.jpg

386 ms

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_83.jpg

64d800268f95527a5bf765c150da5016_83.jpg

384 ms

1.png

1.png

336 ms

2.png

2.png

333 ms

insurance.png

insurance.png

391 ms

logo.png

logo.png

396 ms

default-color.png

default-color.png

434 ms

black-orange.png

black-orange.png

440 ms

blue-black.png

blue-black.png

440 ms

coffee.png

coffee.png

439 ms

yellow-brown.png

yellow-brown.png

447 ms

pink-blue.png

pink-blue.png

449 ms

font-icon.png

font-icon.png

490 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

37 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

38 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

200 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

201 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

201 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

201 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

367 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

368 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

388 ms

fa-brands-400.ttf

fa-brands-400.ttf

406 ms

close.png

close.png

233 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

280 ms

221 ms

fa-regular-400.ttf

fa-regular-400.ttf

256 ms

fa-solid-900.ttf

fa-solid-900.ttf

259 ms

panelicon2.png

panelicon2.png

257 ms

35359895345_b3bfec2db7_s.jpg

35359895345_b3bfec2db7_s.jpg

69 ms

35359895455_490013e074_s.jpg

35359895455_490013e074_s.jpg

75 ms

34550003333_7732e3cef0_s.jpg

34550003333_7732e3cef0_s.jpg

76 ms

34972901870_5816c188f0_s.jpg

34972901870_5816c188f0_s.jpg

76 ms

34550003123_54bc1657ba_s.jpg

34550003123_54bc1657ba_s.jpg

77 ms

34972920720_37b85e86cf_s.jpg

34972920720_37b85e86cf_s.jpg

78 ms

arrow-left-light.png

arrow-left-light.png

59 ms

arrow-right-light.png

arrow-right-light.png

58 ms

Accessibility Review

rodew.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rodew.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rodew.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rodew.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rodew.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rodew.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rodew. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: