2 sec in total
460 ms
1.3 sec
244 ms
Visit rogerharrop.com now to see the best up-to-date Rogerharrop content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rogerharrop.com
30,000 business leaders in 50 countries can't be wrong
Visit rogerharrop.comWe analyzed Rogerharrop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 460 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
rogerharrop.com performance score
460 ms
6 ms
239 ms
229 ms
227 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Rogerharrop.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (460 ms) belongs to the original domain Rogerharrop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 401.3 kB (69%)
579.6 kB
178.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Rogerharrop.com main page is 579.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 272.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rogerharrop needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 161.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 161.5 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rogerharrop.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 226.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (65%)
40
14
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rogerharrop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rogerharrop.com
460 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
6 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.pack.js
239 ms
jquery.pngFix.pack.js
229 ms
functions.js
227 ms
jquery.tweet.js
355 ms
home_functions.js
271 ms
youtube_block.js
271 ms
style_reset.css
344 ms
style_default.css
342 ms
style_template.css
317 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.1.css
395 ms
style_index.css
419 ms
tRzmrnyWfYw
120 ms
e3MQeZlkI1k
159 ms
widgets.js
88 ms
body-bg.gif
204 ms
rh_header_2012.jpg
263 ms
logo_2012.png
204 ms
social-whatsapp.png
201 ms
social-youtube.png
86 ms
social-linkedin.png
202 ms
social-twitter.png
204 ms
social-googleplus.png
259 ms
main-bg.gif
260 ms
nav_main-li.gif
290 ms
larr.gif
291 ms
youtube_embed.gif
340 ms
button-arrow.png
348 ms
more_twitter.gif
359 ms
footer-helicopter-new.png
356 ms
ga.js
6 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
70 ms
www-embed-player.js
95 ms
favicon.ico
58 ms
__utm.gif
59 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
181 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
39 ms
ad_status.js
83 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
88 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
88 ms
syndication
87 ms
394757138054004736
171 ms
rogerharrop.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rogerharrop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rogerharrop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rogerharrop.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rogerharrop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: