Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

rollingbox.com

Rollingbox : agence web digitale à Versailles Yvelines et Lyon

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

524 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

405 ms

rollingbox.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rollingbox.com now to see the best up-to-date Rollingbox content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rollingbox.com

Rollingbox est une agence digitale située à Versailles dans les Yvelines. Création de site internet et sites mobiles, inbound marketing...

Visit rollingbox.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rollingbox.com page load time and found that the first response time was 524 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rollingbox.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value24.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value26.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value48.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rollingbox.com

524 ms

services.svg

143 ms

arrow-menu-mobile.png

131 ms

realisations.svg

33 ms

blog.svg

127 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rollingbox.com, 90% (9 requests) were made to Cdn-fmgfe.nitrocdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (524 ms) belongs to the original domain Rollingbox.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 124.7 kB (75%)

Content Size

165.2 kB

After Optimization

40.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Rollingbox.com main page is 165.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 164.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 124.6 kB

  • Original 164.7 kB
  • After minification 164.6 kB
  • After compression 40.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.6 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 72 B

  • Original 479 B
  • After minification 407 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rollingbox needs image optimization as it can save up to 72 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

4

After Optimization

4

The browser has sent 4 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rollingbox. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rollingbox.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

rollingbox.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rollingbox.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rollingbox.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rollingbox.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of PARSED_DOMAIN, but there is no image specified in description. It would be a good idea for the website admin to select a nice image that can properly represent the website in Open Graph data, otherwise the first found image will be taken for this purpose and social media information block will look like this: