2.1 sec in total
72 ms
1.8 sec
240 ms
Welcome to rollinghillsvineyard.org homepage info - get ready to check Rolling Hills Vineyard best content right away, or after learning these important things about rollinghillsvineyard.org
Visit rollinghillsvineyard.orgWe analyzed Rollinghillsvineyard.org page load time and found that the first response time was 72 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
rollinghillsvineyard.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value11.3 s
0/100
25%
Value8.0 s
21/100
10%
Value660 ms
45/100
30%
Value0.51
15/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
72 ms
1065 ms
38 ms
10 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rollinghillsvineyard.org, 92% (55 requests) were made to Rhvc.org and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Rhvc.org.
Page size can be reduced by 664.7 kB (16%)
4.1 MB
3.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rollinghillsvineyard.org main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 490.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rolling Hills Vineyard needs image optimization as it can save up to 490.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 126.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 126.2 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rollinghillsvineyard.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (72%)
50
14
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rolling Hills Vineyard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rollinghillsvineyard.org
72 ms
rhvc.org
1065 ms
css
38 ms
layerslider.css
10 ms
css
76 ms
style.min.css
100 ms
style.css
19 ms
font-awesome.min.css
93 ms
style.min.css
91 ms
style.css
31 ms
stylesheet.min.css
41 ms
print.css
96 ms
style_dynamic.css
75 ms
responsive.min.css
69 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
75 ms
custom_css.css
120 ms
style.css
84 ms
jquery.min.js
95 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
156 ms
layerslider.utils.js
196 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
105 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
104 ms
v1
77 ms
qode-like.min.js
162 ms
plugins.js
116 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
192 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
129 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
188 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
137 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
147 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
157 ms
jquery.stretch.js
220 ms
js
101 ms
default_dynamic.js
167 ms
default.min.js
249 ms
custom_js.js
174 ms
comment-reply.min.js
185 ms
ajax.min.js
193 ms
functions.js
255 ms
style.css
179 ms
close-btn.png
190 ms
logo.png
187 ms
logo-blue.png
30 ms
menu-icon.png
31 ms
pixie_1644268003607.png
232 ms
Screen-1-of-1.jpg
155 ms
In-Person-and-Online.jpg
163 ms
Sermons.jpg
162 ms
jump-square.jpg
159 ms
watch-square.jpg
161 ms
worship-square.jpg
164 ms
footer-logo.png
159 ms
proxima_nova_reg-webfont.woff
229 ms
mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_thin_0-webfont.woff
230 ms
galano_grotesque_medium-webfont.woff
230 ms
proximanova-regularitalic-webfont.woff
186 ms
mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_thin_italic_0-webfont.woff
294 ms
mark_simonson_-_proxima_nova_semibold_0-webfont.woff
294 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
295 ms
galano_grotesque_bold-webfont.woff
131 ms
rollinghillsvineyard.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rollinghillsvineyard.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rollinghillsvineyard.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rollinghillsvineyard.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rollinghillsvineyard.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rollinghillsvineyard.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rolling Hills Vineyard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: