Tools & Wizards About Us
rolltorollprocessingmachines.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

Slitter Rewinder Machine, Roll to Roll Processing Machines

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

169 ms

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Roll To Processing Machines content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

Rewinding Machine, Slitter Rewinder Machine, Slitting Machine for Flexible Packaging, Paper industry, Slitter Rewinder Machine Manufacturer India

Visit rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

53/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.7 s

45/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

179 ms

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

248 ms

analytics.js

7 ms

prettyPhoto.css

125 ms

captcha.css

126 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 485.7 kB (67%)

Content Size

725.8 kB

After Optimization

240.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com main page is 725.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 491.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 38.6 kB
  • After minification 32.5 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 368.4 kB

  • Original 491.7 kB
  • After minification 123.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Roll To Processing Machines needs image optimization as it can save up to 368.4 kB or 75% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 63.5 kB

  • Original 143.3 kB
  • After minification 123.5 kB
  • After compression 79.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.5 kB or 44% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 52.2 kB
  • After minification 51.7 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 21.6 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (39%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roll To Processing Machines. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

179 ms

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

248 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

7 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

125 ms

captcha.css

captcha.css

126 ms

camera.css

camera.css

542 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

419 ms

site.css

site.css

1412 ms

bootstrap-responsive.css

bootstrap-responsive.css

306 ms

forgotten%20futurist%20rg.ttf

forgotten%20futurist%20rg.ttf

179 ms

css

css

26 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

296 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

237 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

298 ms

camera.js

camera.js

417 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

358 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

364 ms

custom.js

custom.js

421 ms

logo.png

logo.png

424 ms

collect

collect

26 ms

slider_shadow-2.jpg

slider_shadow-2.jpg

454 ms

11.png

11.png

510 ms

22.png

22.png

515 ms

33.png

33.png

628 ms

bullet-arrow-blue-2.png

bullet-arrow-blue-2.png

513 ms

JAS-ANZE1.png

JAS-ANZE1.png

571 ms

js

js

58 ms

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

463 ms

collect

collect

54 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

85 ms

line.jpg

line.jpg

85 ms

top_socials-1.png

top_socials-1.png

85 ms

aword_icon.png

aword_icon.png

83 ms

zoom.png

zoom.png

86 ms

bullet-arrow-blue-1.png

bullet-arrow-blue-1.png

84 ms

p4.png

p4.png

121 ms

caption_bg.png

caption_bg.png

61 ms

award1.jpg

award1.jpg

117 ms

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

104 ms

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

www.rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

111 ms

Roll-To-Roll-Process.jpg

Roll-To-Roll-Process.jpg

174 ms

Accessibility Review

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rolltorollprocessingmachines.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rolltorollprocessingmachines.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roll To Processing Machines. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: