Tools & Wizards About Us
romafencegroup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

romafencegroup.com

Roma Fence Group Ontario Fencing Company - HomeRoma Fence Group | Ontario Fencing Company

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

52 ms

Resources Loaded

2.8 sec

Page Rendered

575 ms

romafencegroup.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Roma Fence Group content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about romafencegroup.com

Roma Fence is founded upon principles of honesty and integrity, building a reputation that has earned the respect of the fence association and its members.

Visit romafencegroup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Romafencegroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 52 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

romafencegroup.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.9 s

7/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

66/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,400 ms

16/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

romafencegroup.com

52 ms

romafencegroup.com

88 ms

style.css

48 ms

css

47 ms

bootstrap.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Romafencegroup.com, 21% (20 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 MB (52%)

Content Size

4.2 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Romafencegroup.com main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 95.5 kB

  • Original 115.2 kB
  • After minification 104.6 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 2.1 MB

  • Original 4.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Roma Fence Group needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.1 MB or 52% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 41 B

  • Original 6.5 kB
  • After minification 6.5 kB
  • After compression 6.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (65%)

Requests Now

84

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roma Fence Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

romafencegroup.com

romafencegroup.com

52 ms

romafencegroup.com

romafencegroup.com

88 ms

style.css

style.css

48 ms

css

css

47 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

83 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

68 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

65 ms

js

js

103 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

64 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

56 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

74 ms

styles.css

styles.css

76 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

74 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

75 ms

a11y-toolbar.css

a11y-toolbar.css

78 ms

a11y.css

a11y.css

83 ms

a11y-fontsize-alt.css

a11y-fontsize-alt.css

82 ms

wpa-style.css

wpa-style.css

84 ms

styles.css

styles.css

85 ms

wpr-hamburger.css

wpr-hamburger.css

86 ms

wprmenu.css

wprmenu.css

93 ms

wpr-icons.css

wpr-icons.css

97 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

59 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

99 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

101 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

115 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

102 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

107 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

111 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

113 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

116 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

116 ms

touchSwipe.js

touchSwipe.js

122 ms

wprmenu.js

wprmenu.js

125 ms

s-202437.js

s-202437.js

48 ms

js

js

87 ms

fingerprint.min.js

fingerprint.min.js

127 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

128 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

129 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

129 ms

index.js

index.js

135 ms

api.js

api.js

69 ms

e-202437.js

e-202437.js

46 ms

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

jquery.matchHeight-min.js

71 ms

index.js

index.js

138 ms

wpa-toolbar.min.js

wpa-toolbar.min.js

111 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

97 ms

sourcebuster.min.js

sourcebuster.min.js

95 ms

95 ms

order-attribution.min.js

order-attribution.min.js

203 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

196 ms

index.js

index.js

186 ms

longdesc.min.js

longdesc.min.js

186 ms

wp-accessibility.min.js

wp-accessibility.min.js

185 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

184 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

185 ms

js_scroll2top.js

js_scroll2top.js

183 ms

jquery.fancybox.js

jquery.fancybox.js

179 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

178 ms

home-page.jpeg

home-page.jpeg

254 ms

logo.png

logo.png

186 ms

feature.png

feature.png

262 ms

tick.png

tick.png

186 ms

project-bg.png

project-bg.png

270 ms

comma.png

comma.png

186 ms

American-Fence-Association.jpg

American-Fence-Association.jpg

261 ms

BILD.jpg

BILD.jpg

227 ms

Canadian-Fence-Industry.jpg

Canadian-Fence-Industry.jpg

260 ms

CANASA-e1629210335599.png

CANASA-e1629210335599.png

261 ms

Dig-Safe.jpg

Dig-Safe.jpg

261 ms

Landscape-Ontario.jpg

Landscape-Ontario.jpg

299 ms

ORCGA.jpg

ORCGA.jpg

300 ms

Toronto-Construction.jpg

Toronto-Construction.jpg

262 ms

AES-2-01.png

AES-2-01.png

2425 ms

Chain_Link_Black_2.jpg

Chain_Link_Black_2.jpg

420 ms

Concrete-2-01.png

Concrete-2-01.png

694 ms

Farm_Fence_3.jpg

Farm_Fence_3.jpg

427 ms

IRON-2-01.png

IRON-2-01.png

2425 ms

Wood-2-01.png

Wood-2-01.png

1638 ms

welder-icon-e1629210610458.png

welder-icon-e1629210610458.png

517 ms

Fence-Installer-Icon-e1628710854706.png

Fence-Installer-Icon-e1628710854706.png

451 ms

CoverArt-2023.png

CoverArt-2023.png

647 ms

Blog-Header_250821.png

Blog-Header_250821.png

945 ms

NaturalLawnArt2_020621-1.png

NaturalLawnArt2_020621-1.png

905 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff

158 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff

178 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff

193 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff

211 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVQ.woff

211 ms

raleway-bold-webfont.woff

raleway-bold-webfont.woff

126 ms

Raleway%20SemiBold.woff

Raleway%20SemiBold.woff

111 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

85 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

126 ms

raleway-regular-webfont.woff

raleway-regular-webfont.woff

126 ms

triangle-hover.png

triangle-hover.png

49 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

16 ms

Accessibility Review

romafencegroup.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

romafencegroup.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

romafencegroup.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Romafencegroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Romafencegroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

romafencegroup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roma Fence Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: