16.4 sec in total
2.5 sec
13.7 sec
212 ms
Visit romantic.com now to see the best up-to-date Romantic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about romantic.com
This website is for sale! romantic.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, romantic.com has ...
Visit romantic.comWe analyzed Romantic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.5 sec and then it took 14 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
romantic.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0.8 s
100/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value70 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value2.9 s
96/100
10%
2453 ms
138 ms
147 ms
2220 ms
76 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Romantic.com, 15% (16 requests) were made to Tp4.sinaimg.cn and 11% (12 requests) were made to Tp2.sinaimg.cn. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (8.9 sec) relates to the external source Widget.weibo.com.
Page size can be reduced by 144.0 kB (36%)
402.8 kB
258.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Romantic.com main page is 402.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 215.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Romantic images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.9 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Romantic.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (17%)
106
88
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Romantic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
romantic.com
2453 ms
css.css
138 ms
ap.js
147 ms
stat.php
2220 ms
200x130.js
76 ms
wx_xl.png
1361 ms
topbj.jpg
441 ms
ico01.gif
222 ms
ico03.gif
220 ms
emil.gif
218 ms
tool_310x80.gif
439 ms
jipiao_310x80.gif
371 ms
jiudian_310x80.gif
437 ms
bbg1.gif
293 ms
iconc1.gif
294 ms
000.gif
369 ms
index.php
2349 ms
index.php
8895 ms
tuan_200x130.jpg
3232 ms
weiboShow.css
323 ms
skin_default.css
327 ms
gaea_1_19.js
540 ms
stat.htm
163 ms
core.php
1288 ms
show.js
500 ms
suda.js
514 ms
wb_logo16_a.png
48 ms
0
801 ms
634172dfgw1f20znfvastj20hs0bvt96.jpg
253 ms
a759dd45gw1f1syo43nt7j20rt0fon1f.jpg
249 ms
634172dfgw1f1palafv87j20go09fq48.jpg
272 ms
634172dfgw1f1ilcwjuiej20lz0eqq8r.jpg
287 ms
0
868 ms
1
843 ms
1
1561 ms
0
1565 ms
0
807 ms
0
790 ms
1
795 ms
1
793 ms
0
787 ms
0
819 ms
634172dfgw1f1qoa76kd6j20hr2zrwn2.jpg
256 ms
634172dfgw1f1og3u93lmj20hs0bgtb3.jpg
266 ms
634172dfgw1f1kmmlccntj20go0apwf8.jpg
282 ms
634172dfgw1f1jrqaxfvhj20gj0b7q3o.jpg
251 ms
634172dfgw1f1ilwxqka1j20et0edq53.jpg
248 ms
634172dfgw1f1jn3qvrovj20p00gdq4v.jpg
254 ms
634172dfgw1f1ibrmpz8rj20c79qpb2a.jpg
258 ms
1
846 ms
0
851 ms
0
841 ms
1
847 ms
0
860 ms
0
849 ms
634172dfgw1f1hellllhkj20p00gnju6.jpg
280 ms
634172dfgw1f1h4lbjs87j20c859k7wh.jpg
286 ms
0
817 ms
0
826 ms
0
810 ms
0
812 ms
icon_user.png
32 ms
btns_bg.png
32 ms
icon_follow.png
31 ms
634172dfgw1f1yttx3wjuj20hs0bwgme.jpg
252 ms
634172dfgw1f1wcpqrs1gj20c80800tf.jpg
244 ms
8cf94688jw1f1rmyiiuybj21kw0py7df.jpg
238 ms
634172dfgw1f1qet40wajj20c8148gps.jpg
223 ms
634172dfgw1f1ku153fg4j20e80iyta2.jpg
237 ms
634172dfgw1f1hartn9fkj20dl0g2acw.jpg
246 ms
634172dfgw1f1gb1jjt9zj20c80ibmzh.jpg
264 ms
bg_trans.png
10 ms
icon_tips.png
10 ms
a.gif
1146 ms
tmp.gif
1301 ms
pic.gif
751 ms
0
23 ms
c1393ef3jw1ev7xm9yhinj20dw07pt93.jpg
18 ms
c1393ef3jw1ev6t9srrzrj20gj09qdhl.jpg
32 ms
c1393ef3jw1euzwdkh8koj203e02k746.jpg
61 ms
c1393ef3jw1euyt4yz7ydj20g4092q41.jpg
93 ms
1
62 ms
1
69 ms
1
53 ms
1
70 ms
0
53 ms
1
55 ms
c1393ef3jw1euyrw2bbjdj20g409gtad.jpg
65 ms
c1393ef3gw1ete5xhmuxmj20dw099wf0.jpg
49 ms
c1393ef3gw1epshpt4t21j20gc0b4gpc.jpg
59 ms
c1393ef3gw1eprfoyhqiij20dw09gjs6.jpg
72 ms
0
51 ms
0
71 ms
0
68 ms
1
52 ms
1
60 ms
0
78 ms
0
64 ms
1
59 ms
0
47 ms
1
66 ms
0
79 ms
1
59 ms
0
63 ms
0
61 ms
a.gif
426 ms
tmp.gif
2104 ms
romantic.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
romantic.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
romantic.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
N/A
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Romantic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Romantic.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
romantic.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Romantic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: