4.8 sec in total
648 ms
3.4 sec
775 ms
Visit roofcalc.org now to see the best up-to-date Roof Calc content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roofcalc.org
Need to Know How Much Roofs Cost? Estimate Roof Replacement Cost in Seconds!Calculate Roof Installation Cost based on house dimensions, slope, type of materials, and building height. You can estimate ...
Visit roofcalc.orgWe analyzed Roofcalc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 648 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
roofcalc.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value4.9 s
29/100
25%
Value7.8 s
24/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
648 ms
122 ms
126 ms
133 ms
137 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Roofcalc.org, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (648 ms) belongs to the original domain Roofcalc.org.
Page size can be reduced by 609.5 kB (49%)
1.2 MB
622.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Roofcalc.org main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 512.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 139.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.5 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roof Calc images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 320.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 320.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 144.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roofcalc.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 56 (65%)
86
30
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roof Calc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.roofcalc.org
648 ms
nx.css
122 ms
pw.css
126 ms
minic.css
133 ms
mfc-pop.css
137 ms
mfc-widget.css
139 ms
pop-rpi.css
160 ms
mini-calc.css
184 ms
zip-box.css
181 ms
show-slide.css
214 ms
exit.css
206 ms
widget.css
211 ms
demo.css
242 ms
css
38 ms
avg.css
243 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
mfc-pop.js
263 ms
form.js
276 ms
lep.js
286 ms
style.css
274 ms
style.css
322 ms
font-awesome.css
308 ms
css
44 ms
genericons.css
308 ms
jetpack.css
355 ms
jquery.js
386 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
376 ms
script.min.js
364 ms
www.roofcalc.org
449 ms
calc-widget.js
416 ms
form.js
389 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
57 ms
theme.js
380 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
401 ms
comment-reply.min.js
452 ms
wp-embed.min.js
453 ms
sharing.js
452 ms
e-201609.js
5 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
266 ms
analytics.js
45 ms
gpt.js
44 ms
pinit_fg_en_rect_gray_20.png
31 ms
roof-calc-home.png
101 ms
map.png
113 ms
default-1024x537.gif
456 ms
RoofCalc.org-Estimate-Reroofing-Cost.jpg
458 ms
US-Regional-Roof-Prices.gif
166 ms
roof-diagram-300x209.jpg
165 ms
roofing-prices-e1367454293156.jpg
455 ms
share-fb.jpg
194 ms
share-gp.jpg
195 ms
share-tw.jpg
454 ms
roofing-pros.png
457 ms
leo-the-roofer.png
457 ms
tweet_button.html
71 ms
calc-results.png
496 ms
roofing-price-scale.png
496 ms
collect
30 ms
pubads_impl_81.js
29 ms
jot
358 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
16 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
60 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
62 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
62 ms
fontawesome.woff
457 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBp0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
62 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxrfB31yxOzP-czbf6AAKCVo.ttf
61 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxi8cqLH4MEiSE0ROcU-qHOA.ttf
59 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxp_TkvowlIOtbR7ePgFOpF4.ttf
61 ms
collect
345 ms
container.html
293 ms
plusone.js
332 ms
sdk.js
534 ms
pinit.js
259 ms
in.js
23 ms
g.gif
12 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
24 ms
pinit_main.js
54 ms
share
116 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
107 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
45 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
72 ms
sharebutton
105 ms
count.json
99 ms
postmessageRelay
81 ms
rs=AGLTcCNVayw58ATXmq5na_KkaQDUov7ewA
18 ms
rs=AGLTcCNcw2qHw9t2weDHTdT9SHydDSdOHQ
18 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
94 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
105 ms
api.js
48 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
66 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
62 ms
59 ms
xd_arbiter.php
212 ms
xd_arbiter.php
418 ms
5564897151135117284.js
385 ms
share_button.php
53 ms
vpc6VNjRPXV.js
485 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
549 ms
roofcalc.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
roofcalc.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
roofcalc.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roofcalc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roofcalc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roofcalc.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roof Calc. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: