Tools & Wizards About Us
roofingcharlotte.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

roofingcharlotte.net

Charlotte Roofing Contractor | Baker Roofing Company

Page Load Speed

8.7 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

623 ms

roofingcharlotte.net screenshot

About Website

Visit roofingcharlotte.net now to see the best up-to-date Roofing Charlotte content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roofingcharlotte.net

Baker Roofing Company has been providing commercial roofing services and residential roof repair and replacement in Charlotte since 1915!

Visit roofingcharlotte.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Roofingcharlotte.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roofingcharlotte.net performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value8,900 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.8 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roofingcharlotte.net

2993 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

92 ms

prettyPhoto.css

110 ms

bootstrap.min.css

190 ms

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Roofingcharlotte.net, 22% (19 requests) were made to Code.cdn.mozilla.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Roofingcharlotte.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 888.1 kB (37%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Roofingcharlotte.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 58.7 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 66.2 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 83.1 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roofing Charlotte images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 397.2 kB

  • Original 573.7 kB
  • After minification 563.4 kB
  • After compression 176.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 397.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 349.2 kB

  • Original 406.6 kB
  • After minification 347.3 kB
  • After compression 57.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roofingcharlotte.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 349.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (52%)

Requests Now

63

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roofing Charlotte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

roofingcharlotte.net

roofingcharlotte.net

2993 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

92 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

110 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

190 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

137 ms

animate.css

animate.css

160 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

163 ms

styles.css

styles.css

244 ms

ls-shortcodes.css

ls-shortcodes.css

199 ms

settings.css

settings.css

230 ms

style.css

style.css

303 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

235 ms

fira.css

fira.css

14 ms

css

css

40 ms

roofingcharlotte.net

roofingcharlotte.net

801 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

347 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

290 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

313 ms

frontend.js

frontend.js

350 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

402 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

395 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

388 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

410 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

413 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

431 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

434 ms

widget.min.js

widget.min.js

453 ms

accordion.min.js

accordion.min.js

464 ms

tabs.min.js

tabs.min.js

459 ms

ls_sc_scripts.js

ls_sc_scripts.js

482 ms

js

js

80 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

502 ms

script.js

script.js

516 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

536 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

512 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

110 ms

phone.png

phone.png

159 ms

newlogopsd.png

newlogopsd.png

160 ms

tick-copy.png

tick-copy.png

161 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

157 ms

107465630.png

107465630.png

249 ms

download.png

download.png

310 ms

roofing1.jpg

roofing1.jpg

247 ms

download2.jpg

download2.jpg

160 ms

roof-replacement.jpg

roof-replacement.jpg

653 ms

Untitled-1-copy1.jpg

Untitled-1-copy1.jpg

655 ms

Metal-Tile.jpg

Metal-Tile.jpg

654 ms

Untitled-1-copy-150x150.jpg

Untitled-1-copy-150x150.jpg

308 ms

jane_doe-150x150.jpg

jane_doe-150x150.jpg

309 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

657 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

655 ms

googlePlus.png

googlePlus.png

657 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

655 ms

pinterest.png

pinterest.png

657 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

655 ms

1447668373_yelp.png

1447668373_yelp.png

785 ms

tumblr.png

tumblr.png

741 ms

delicious.png

delicious.png

786 ms

FiraSans-Regular.woff

FiraSans-Regular.woff

193 ms

FiraSans-Medium.woff

FiraSans-Medium.woff

115 ms

FiraSans-Light.woff

FiraSans-Light.woff

122 ms

FiraSans-UltraLight.woff

FiraSans-UltraLight.woff

122 ms

FiraSans-Hair.woff

FiraSans-Hair.woff

121 ms

FiraSans-SemiBold.woff

FiraSans-SemiBold.woff

122 ms

FiraSans-Bold.woff

FiraSans-Bold.woff

121 ms

FiraSans-ExtraBold.woff

FiraSans-ExtraBold.woff

122 ms

FiraSans-Heavy.woff

FiraSans-Heavy.woff

122 ms

UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4UpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf

UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4UpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf

121 ms

collect

collect

109 ms

main2.jpg

main2.jpg

727 ms

quote.png

quote.png

620 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

701 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

763 ms

FiraSans-Italic.woff

FiraSans-Italic.woff

87 ms

FiraSans-MediumItalic.woff

FiraSans-MediumItalic.woff

88 ms

FiraSans-LightItalic.woff

FiraSans-LightItalic.woff

88 ms

FiraSans-UltraLightItalic.woff

FiraSans-UltraLightItalic.woff

85 ms

FiraSans-HairItalic.woff

FiraSans-HairItalic.woff

89 ms

FiraSans-SemiBoldItalic.woff

FiraSans-SemiBoldItalic.woff

88 ms

FiraSans-BoldItalic.woff

FiraSans-BoldItalic.woff

88 ms

FiraSans-ExtraBoldItalic.woff

FiraSans-ExtraBoldItalic.woff

90 ms

FiraSans-HeavyItalic.woff

FiraSans-HeavyItalic.woff

88 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

204 ms

shingle-roof-repair.png

shingle-roof-repair.png

544 ms

New-Home-Construction.png

New-Home-Construction.png

290 ms

Accessibility Review

roofingcharlotte.net accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

roofingcharlotte.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

roofingcharlotte.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roofingcharlotte.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roofingcharlotte.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roofingcharlotte.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roofing Charlotte. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: