Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

rooftex.com

Roofing Contractors Association of Texas - The Roofing Contractors Association of Texas (RCAT)

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

217 ms

rooftex.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rooftex.com homepage info - get ready to check Rooftex best content right away, or after learning these important things about rooftex.com

6080 S Hulen St. Suite 360, PMB 396 | Fort Worth, TX 76132

Visit rooftex.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rooftex.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rooftex.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

9/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value600 ms

50/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rooftex.com

49 ms

roofingcontractors-texas.com

792 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

18 ms

styles.css

17 ms

settings.css

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Rooftex.com, 90% (56 requests) were made to Roofingcontractors-texas.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (792 ms) relates to the external source Roofingcontractors-texas.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 489.5 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

644.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Rooftex.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 515.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 70.8 kB

  • Original 84.6 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB
  • After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.8 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 37.0 kB

  • Original 515.5 kB
  • After minification 478.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rooftex images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 254.6 kB

  • Original 380.5 kB
  • After minification 366.1 kB
  • After compression 125.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 254.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 127.1 kB

  • Original 152.9 kB
  • After minification 126.8 kB
  • After compression 25.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rooftex.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 127.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (50%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rooftex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

rooftex.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

rooftex.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rooftex.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rooftex.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rooftex.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rooftex. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: