Tools & Wizards About Us
roscomac.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 14

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    26% of other websites

  • 67

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 32% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

roscomac.com

Roscomac CNC Precision Engineering UK - Production Perfection

Page Load Speed

7.7 sec in total

First Response

334 ms

Resources Loaded

7 sec

Page Rendered

281 ms

roscomac.com screenshot

About Website

Visit roscomac.com now to see the best up-to-date Roscomac content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roscomac.com

We deliver thousands of products and a million parts a year. From miniature connectors to V8 engine blocks, we make it.

Visit roscomac.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roscomac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 334 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roscomac.com performance score

14

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.1 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.79

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.0 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roscomac.com

334 ms

www.roscomac.com

520 ms

style.min.css

38 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

50 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Roscomac.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 319.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Roscomac.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 126.0 kB

  • Original 150.2 kB
  • After minification 141.2 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 126.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roscomac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 350.8 kB
  • After minification 350.8 kB
  • After compression 285.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 77.4 kB

  • Original 341.8 kB
  • After minification 341.0 kB
  • After compression 264.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roscomac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.4 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (68%)

Requests Now

62

After Optimization

20

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roscomac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

roscomac.com

roscomac.com

334 ms

www.roscomac.com

www.roscomac.com

520 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

38 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

50 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

45 ms

team.min.css

team.min.css

82 ms

ctf-styles.min.css

ctf-styles.min.css

160 ms

settings.css

settings.css

244 ms

Defaults.css

Defaults.css

246 ms

search-forms.css

search-forms.css

251 ms

style.css

style.css

252 ms

js_composer_front_custom.css

js_composer_front_custom.css

418 ms

css

css

60 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

328 ms

back-compat.min.css

back-compat.min.css

321 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

324 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

345 ms

post-type.min.css

post-type.min.css

346 ms

custom.css

custom.css

479 ms

media.css

media.css

405 ms

legacy.css

legacy.css

409 ms

post-type-dynamic.css

post-type-dynamic.css

416 ms

style.css

style.css

432 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

492 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

41 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

46 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

46 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

517 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

573 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

536 ms

ultimate-params.min.js

ultimate-params.min.js

536 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

557 ms

css

css

73 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

738 ms

photon.min.js

photon.min.js

44 ms

team.min.js

team.min.js

643 ms

script.min.js

script.min.js

643 ms

intersection-observer.js

intersection-observer.js

644 ms

lazy-images.js

lazy-images.js

668 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

668 ms

post-type.min.js

post-type.min.js

670 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

716 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

716 ms

e-202436.js

e-202436.js

44 ms

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf

14 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf

18 ms

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf

20 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

79 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

325 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

323 ms

iStock-1126056052.jpg

iStock-1126056052.jpg

325 ms

Complex-components-2.jpg

Complex-components-2.jpg

326 ms

Quality-control-820.jpg

Quality-control-820.jpg

326 ms

Matsuura-MAM72-820.jpg

Matsuura-MAM72-820.jpg

1106 ms

process-innovation-820-2.jpg

process-innovation-820-2.jpg

1105 ms

ISO-9001-white-Stationery-300x186.jpg

ISO-9001-white-Stationery-300x186.jpg

177 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

23 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

70 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

83 ms

icomoon-the7-microwidgets-16x16.ttf

icomoon-the7-microwidgets-16x16.ttf

286 ms

icomoon-the7-social-icons-16x16.ttf

icomoon-the7-social-icons-16x16.ttf

288 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

363 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

288 ms

collect

collect

217 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

276 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

230 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

231 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

225 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

262 ms

roscomac-pp-logo-titillium-363.png

roscomac-pp-logo-titillium-363.png

323 ms

roscomac-pp-logo-titillium-288.png

roscomac-pp-logo-titillium-288.png

195 ms

js

js

116 ms

iStock-484454230.jpg

iStock-484454230.jpg

309 ms

MatsuuraHeaderImage.jpg

MatsuuraHeaderImage.jpg

244 ms

iStock-922745734.jpg

iStock-922745734.jpg

231 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

84 ms

Accessibility Review

roscomac.com accessibility score

67

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

roscomac.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

roscomac.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roscomac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roscomac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roscomac.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roscomac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: