7.4 sec in total
381 ms
6.6 sec
397 ms
Visit roscomac.com now to see the best up-to-date Roscomac content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about roscomac.com
We deliver thousands of products and a million parts a year. From miniature connectors to V8 engine blocks, we make it.
Visit roscomac.comWe analyzed Roscomac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 381 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
roscomac.com performance score
381 ms
844 ms
94 ms
166 ms
91 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Roscomac.com, 10% (8 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to I0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source I0.wp.com.
Page size can be reduced by 288.0 kB (10%)
2.9 MB
2.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Roscomac.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 129.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 129.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 46.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roscomac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 33.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 77.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roscomac.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 77.9 kB or 23% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (69%)
68
21
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roscomac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
roscomac.com
381 ms
www.roscomac.com
844 ms
js
94 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
166 ms
style.min.css
91 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
95 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
102 ms
classic-themes.min.css
102 ms
team.min.css
263 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
325 ms
settings.css
345 ms
Defaults.css
336 ms
style.css
326 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
648 ms
css
119 ms
main.min.css
439 ms
back-compat.min.css
417 ms
all.min.css
428 ms
fontello.min.css
480 ms
post-type.min.css
475 ms
custom.css
721 ms
media.css
526 ms
legacy.css
678 ms
post-type-dynamic.css
542 ms
style.css
549 ms
style.min.css
626 ms
jetpack.css
91 ms
jquery.min.js
97 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
97 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
692 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
811 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
774 ms
above-the-fold.min.js
774 ms
ultimate-params.min.js
774 ms
custom.min.js
775 ms
css
65 ms
main.min.js
948 ms
photon.min.js
43 ms
team.min.js
830 ms
script.min.js
830 ms
intersection-observer.js
826 ms
lazy-images.js
858 ms
legacy.min.js
894 ms
post-type.min.js
944 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
974 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
977 ms
e-202402.js
64 ms
js
52 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
linkid.js
7 ms
collect
58 ms
NaPecZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7fdMPmCA.ttf
119 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffBzCGItzZg.ttf
153 ms
NaPDcZTIAOhVxoMyOr9n_E7ffHjDGItzZg.ttf
417 ms
collect
93 ms
dummy.png
801 ms
dummy.png
1175 ms
iStock-1126056052.jpg
1126 ms
Complex-components-2.jpg
927 ms
Quality-control-820.jpg
903 ms
Matsuura-MAM72-820.jpg
1101 ms
process-innovation-820-2.jpg
1556 ms
roscomac-logo-1-300x59.png
119 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
332 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
332 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
330 ms
icomoon-the7-microwidgets-16x16.ttf
331 ms
icomoon-the7-social-icons-16x16.ttf
333 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
334 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
333 ms
js
298 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
376 ms
roscomac-pp-logo-titillium-363.png
217 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
183 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
186 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
184 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
188 ms
roscomac-pp-logo-titillium-288.png
124 ms
iStock-484454230.jpg
467 ms
MatsuuraHeaderImage.jpg
325 ms
iStock-922745734.jpg
625 ms
revicons.woff
242 ms
roscomac.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roscomac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roscomac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roscomac.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roscomac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: