Tools & Wizards About Us
rosdfw.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

rosdfw.com

#1 Denton Senior Care | Ray of Sunshine Senior Care

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

71 ms

Resources Loaded

643 ms

Page Rendered

518 ms

rosdfw.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rosdfw content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rosdfw.com

Experience Personalized Home Care. Denton Senior Care Serving [primary-county] and all surrounding areas.

Visit rosdfw.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rosdfw.com page load time and found that the first response time was 71 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rosdfw.com performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value140 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.4

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.6 s

57/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rosdfw.com

71 ms

rosdfw.com

66 ms

style.min.css

22 ms

theme.min.css

38 ms

header-footer.min.css

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Rosdfw.com, 16% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Stcdn.leadconnectorhq.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (288 ms) relates to the external source Asnmsg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 176.6 kB (11%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rosdfw.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 125.3 kB

  • Original 148.9 kB
  • After minification 144.1 kB
  • After compression 23.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 13.9 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rosdfw images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 143.0 kB
  • After minification 143.0 kB
  • After compression 132.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 26.6 kB

  • Original 159.0 kB
  • After minification 154.7 kB
  • After compression 132.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rosdfw.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (78%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rosdfw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rosdfw.com

rosdfw.com

71 ms

rosdfw.com

rosdfw.com

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

22 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

38 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

48 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

43 ms

custom-frontend.min.css

custom-frontend.min.css

30 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

75 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

43 ms

post-6.css

post-6.css

42 ms

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

custom-pro-frontend.min.css

49 ms

post-2.css

post-2.css

79 ms

post-11.css

post-11.css

60 ms

post-250.css

post-250.css

59 ms

post-14.css

post-14.css

66 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

64 ms

style.css

style.css

68 ms

css

css

39 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

70 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

83 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

82 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

87 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

87 ms

js

js

80 ms

form_embed.js

form_embed.js

190 ms

loader.js

loader.js

42 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

108 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

130 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

131 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

132 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

130 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

130 ms

animations.min.css

animations.min.css

131 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

133 ms

app.min.js

app.min.js

132 ms

jquery.sticky.min.js

jquery.sticky.min.js

134 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

134 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

131 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

132 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

136 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

134 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

133 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

120 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

105 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

105 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

106 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

107 ms

P5zxrn14sUaNMbWHiRQp

P5zxrn14sUaNMbWHiRQp

288 ms

Ray-of-sunshine-senior-care-1.png

Ray-of-sunshine-senior-care-1.png

62 ms

ray-menu.gif

ray-menu.gif

41 ms

ray-of-sunshine-hero.png

ray-of-sunshine-hero.png

54 ms

care-plans.png

care-plans.png

53 ms

ray-of-sunshine-favicon-removebg-preview.png

ray-of-sunshine-favicon-removebg-preview.png

50 ms

24-hour-care_2.svg

24-hour-care_2.svg

52 ms

dementia-care_1.svg

dementia-care_1.svg

57 ms

veterans-care.svg

veterans-care.svg

64 ms

companion-care_4.svg

companion-care_4.svg

66 ms

respite-care_3.svg

respite-care_3.svg

71 ms

senior-care.svg

senior-care.svg

130 ms

senior-home-peace.png

senior-home-peace.png

211 ms

APPROVED-250-SENIOR-NETWORK-EXPERT-CLEAR.png

APPROVED-250-SENIOR-NETWORK-EXPERT-CLEAR.png

99 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf

23 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

38 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

47 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf

48 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf

48 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf

49 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

48 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf

46 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf

49 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

109 ms

regular.css

regular.css

31 ms

solid.css

solid.css

48 ms

brands.css

brands.css

78 ms

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js

iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js

25 ms

pixel.js

pixel.js

27 ms

css

css

19 ms

css

css

33 ms

FormComponent.c88fe4ba.css

FormComponent.c88fe4ba.css

76 ms

vue-multiselect.eb3eab67.css

vue-multiselect.eb3eab67.css

78 ms

app.5efdd9e1.css

app.5efdd9e1.css

99 ms

TextElement.0b941f97.css

TextElement.0b941f97.css

95 ms

TextBoxListElement.b602ad61.css

TextBoxListElement.b602ad61.css

101 ms

OptionElement.05aaf420.css

OptionElement.05aaf420.css

93 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

20 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

9 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

4 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

5 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

10 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

8 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

9 ms

Accessibility Review

rosdfw.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rosdfw.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rosdfw.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rosdfw.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rosdfw.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rosdfw.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rosdfw. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: