Tools & Wizards About Us
rosegal.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rosegal.com

Plus Size Clothing, Plus Size Dress Online Store | Rosegal

Page Load Speed

5 sec in total

First Response

32 ms

Resources Loaded

4 sec

Page Rendered

981 ms

rosegal.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rosegal.com homepage info - get ready to check Rosegal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rosegal.com

Shop the latest cheap plus size clothing for curves & mens fashion styles online with free shipping, including plus size dresses, plus size swimwear, accessories, jewelry and other trendy styles at af...

Visit rosegal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rosegal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 32 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rosegal.com performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

36/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,290 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.39

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rosegal.com

32 ms

www.rosegal.com

37 ms

common_min.css

116 ms

3e28b0a67690789a63c71b598eb0fda8.css

172 ms

plug.min.js

107 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 7% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Rosegal.com, 32% (19 requests) were made to Css.rglcdn.com and 32% (19 requests) were made to Uidesign.rglcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) relates to the external source Uidesign.rglcdn.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 521.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rosegal.com main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 368.1 kB

  • Original 457.5 kB
  • After minification 435.8 kB
  • After compression 89.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 368.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 152.5 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rosegal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 155 B

  • Original 301.5 kB
  • After minification 301.5 kB
  • After compression 301.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 1.1 kB

  • Original 28.7 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB
  • After compression 27.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rosegal.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (21%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

44

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rosegal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rosegal.com

rosegal.com

32 ms

www.rosegal.com

www.rosegal.com

37 ms

common_min.css

common_min.css

116 ms

3e28b0a67690789a63c71b598eb0fda8.css

3e28b0a67690789a63c71b598eb0fda8.css

172 ms

plug.min.js

plug.min.js

107 ms

var_languages.min.js

var_languages.min.js

101 ms

exchange.html

exchange.html

11 ms

common.min.js

common.min.js

103 ms

firebase-app.js

firebase-app.js

93 ms

firebase-messaging.js

firebase-messaging.js

302 ms

firebase-performance.js

firebase-performance.js

149 ms

pwa.min.js

pwa.min.js

99 ms

logsss.common.min.js

logsss.common.min.js

99 ms

732f77d938182cb09713557990c45c70.js

732f77d938182cb09713557990c45c70.js

136 ms

vue.min.js

vue.min.js

105 ms

client.bundle.49c5cf75.js

client.bundle.49c5cf75.js

134 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

159 ms

pclogo.png

pclogo.png

114 ms

new.gif

new.gif

156 ms

a.jpg

a.jpg

30 ms

xubox_loading0.gif

xubox_loading0.gif

15 ms

bg_image_default.png

bg_image_default.png

13 ms

loading_big.gif

loading_big.gif

4 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

74 ms

K016no8NLPkfFRXZ5IEsv4OJrl7VD3Wm.gif

K016no8NLPkfFRXZ5IEsv4OJrl7VD3Wm.gif

493 ms

442 ms

search_loading.gif

search_loading.gif

67 ms

fire.png

fire.png

54 ms

spritesheet.png

spritesheet.png

73 ms

download_android.png

download_android.png

66 ms

icon_pay.png

icon_pay.png

71 ms

xubox_ico0.png

xubox_ico0.png

65 ms

arrow_left2.1.png

arrow_left2.1.png

65 ms

goods_default.png

goods_default.png

70 ms

arrow_right2.1.png

arrow_right2.1.png

51 ms

camera.png

camera.png

51 ms

loading_big.gif

loading_big.gif

69 ms

sprite.png

sprite.png

64 ms

780x480.jpg

780x480.jpg

71 ms

pc_bg.jpg

pc_bg.jpg

65 ms

wpc.gif

wpc.gif

459 ms

Rubik-Regular.woff

Rubik-Regular.woff

420 ms

Rubik-Medium.woff

Rubik-Medium.woff

367 ms

font_1508924_68obwjkhx59.css

font_1508924_68obwjkhx59.css

114 ms

xpc01.png

xpc01.png

698 ms

xpc05.gif

xpc05.gif

479 ms

xpc06.jpg

xpc06.jpg

1111 ms

xpc07.jpg

xpc07.jpg

1133 ms

xpc08.jpg

xpc08.jpg

1655 ms

xgpc01.jpg

xgpc01.jpg

1021 ms

xgpc02.jpg

xgpc02.jpg

1333 ms

b.jpg

b.jpg

1950 ms

497502801.jpg

497502801.jpg

2141 ms

507690207.jpg

507690207.jpg

2532 ms

510994007.jpg

510994007.jpg

2245 ms

v.jpg

v.jpg

2578 ms

points.png

points.png

39 ms

109.49c5cf75.js

109.49c5cf75.js

5 ms

xpc02.png

xpc02.png

2159 ms

xpc04.jpg

xpc04.jpg

3168 ms

Accessibility Review

rosegal.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rosegal.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rosegal.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rosegal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rosegal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rosegal.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rosegal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: