Tools & Wizards About Us
rothe.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 15

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    27% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

rothe.in

Rothe Packtech | Machines Manufacturer Pune | Conveyer India

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

149 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

413 ms

rothe.in screenshot

About Website

Visit rothe.in now to see the best up-to-date Rothe content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rothe.in

Rothe Packtech is a Leading Machine Manufacturer in Pune, Delivering Quality Conveyors Across India. We provides customized and innovative turnkey project solutions.

Visit rothe.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Rothe.in page load time and found that the first response time was 149 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rothe.in performance score

15

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value28.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value760 ms

39/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.483

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.8 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rothe.in

149 ms

rothe.in

315 ms

bootstrap.min.css

128 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

188 ms

animate.css

191 ms

Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (96 requests) were addressed to the original Rothe.in, 9% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (700 ms) belongs to the original domain Rothe.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 485.4 kB (9%)

Content Size

5.6 MB

After Optimization

5.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rothe.in main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 47.8 kB

  • Original 54.1 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 6.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 126.8 kB

  • Original 4.6 MB
  • After minification 4.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rothe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 144.3 kB

  • Original 601.6 kB
  • After minification 601.6 kB
  • After compression 457.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.3 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-53%

Potential reduce by 166.5 kB

  • Original 311.4 kB
  • After minification 300.3 kB
  • After compression 144.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rothe.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 166.5 kB or 53% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (37%)

Requests Now

94

After Optimization

59

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 94 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rothe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rothe.in

rothe.in

149 ms

rothe.in

rothe.in

315 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

128 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

188 ms

animate.css

animate.css

191 ms

css-plugin-collections.css

css-plugin-collections.css

305 ms

menuzord-megamenu.css

menuzord-megamenu.css

190 ms

menuzord-rounded-boxed.css

menuzord-rounded-boxed.css

196 ms

style-main.css

style-main.css

317 ms

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

custom-bootstrap-margin-padding.css

256 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

252 ms

settings.css

settings.css

254 ms

layers.css

layers.css

329 ms

navigation.css

navigation.css

325 ms

theme-skin-color-set1.css

theme-skin-color-set1.css

327 ms

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

jquery-2.2.4.min.js

381 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

432 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

378 ms

jquery-plugin-collection.js

jquery-plugin-collection.js

557 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

453 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

391 ms

js

js

64 ms

custom.js

custom.js

453 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

444 ms

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

revolution.extension.carousel.min.js

455 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

493 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

513 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

519 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

518 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

518 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

559 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

581 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

273 ms

font-awesome-animation.min.css

font-awesome-animation.min.css

271 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

272 ms

elegant-icons.css

elegant-icons.css

307 ms

utility-classes.css

utility-classes.css

311 ms

css

css

30 ms

close.png

close.png

105 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

106 ms

prev.png

prev.png

105 ms

next.png

next.png

104 ms

1.png

1.png

118 ms

embed

embed

270 ms

2.png

2.png

110 ms

3.png

3.png

108 ms

4.png

4.png

110 ms

5.png

5.png

107 ms

logo.png

logo.png

173 ms

6.png

6.png

174 ms

bg4.jpg

bg4.jpg

501 ms

bg5.jpg

bg5.jpg

499 ms

bg6.jpg

bg6.jpg

469 ms

Slide-1.jpg

Slide-1.jpg

380 ms

about-4.png

about-4.png

281 ms

about-5.png

about-5.png

269 ms

about-6.png

about-6.png

336 ms

1.png

1.png

333 ms

gallery-1.jpg

gallery-1.jpg

399 ms

gallery-2.jpg

gallery-2.jpg

402 ms

gallery-3.jpg

gallery-3.jpg

508 ms

gallery-4.jpg

gallery-4.jpg

464 ms

gallery-5.jpg

gallery-5.jpg

466 ms

gallery-6.jpg

gallery-6.jpg

530 ms

gallery-7.jpg

gallery-7.jpg

532 ms

gallery-8.jpg

gallery-8.jpg

532 ms

gallery-9.jpg

gallery-9.jpg

562 ms

gallery-10.jpg

gallery-10.jpg

563 ms

6.jpg

6.jpg

571 ms

12.jpg

12.jpg

595 ms

1.png

1.png

596 ms

2.png

2.png

596 ms

3.png

3.png

625 ms

4.png

4.png

624 ms

5.png

5.png

641 ms

technology.jpg

technology.jpg

662 ms

w1.png

w1.png

659 ms

w2.png

w2.png

659 ms

w3.png

w3.png

700 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

145 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff

164 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff

178 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff

180 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff

180 ms

font

font

181 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmb2Rl.woff

180 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjo0oSmb2Rl.woff

180 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojIWmb2Rl.woff

180 ms

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rl.woff

BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4Omb2Rl.woff

199 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

590 ms

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

fontawesome-webfont3e6e.woff

611 ms

w4.png

w4.png

617 ms

w5.png

w5.png

617 ms

w6.png

w6.png

558 ms

w7.png

w7.png

592 ms

w8.png

w8.png

584 ms

js

js

75 ms

bootstrap-parent-modal.html

bootstrap-parent-modal.html

566 ms

style-switcher.html

style-switcher.html

573 ms

w9.png

w9.png

459 ms

w10.png

w10.png

457 ms

download.png

download.png

463 ms

w12.png

w12.png

441 ms

w13.png

w13.png

453 ms

w14.png

w14.png

413 ms

w15.png

w15.png

439 ms

w16.png

w16.png

437 ms

w17.png

w17.png

413 ms

w18.png

w18.png

421 ms

bg1.jpg

bg1.jpg

411 ms

Accessibility Review

rothe.in accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

rothe.in best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

rothe.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rothe.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rothe.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rothe.in

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rothe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: