Tools & Wizards About Us
rothewood.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 58

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 89

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    66% of websites

rothewood.com

Daycare and Preschool in Surrey and Richmond | Rothewood Academy

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

411 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

679 ms

rothewood.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rothewood.com homepage info - get ready to check Rothewood best content right away, or after learning these important things about rothewood.com

Daycare and preschool in Surrey and Richmond, BC. At Rothewood Academy we are dedicated to teaching kids and approaches to early learning.

Visit rothewood.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rothewood.com page load time and found that the first response time was 411 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rothewood.com performance score

58

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.31

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rothewood.com

411 ms

style.min.css

188 ms

classic-themes.min.css

192 ms

learndash_quiz_front.min.css

191 ms

jquery.dropdown.min.css

194 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Rothewood.com, 16% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (467 ms) belongs to the original domain Rothewood.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.1 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rothewood.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.2 kB

  • Original 90.1 kB
  • After minification 84.8 kB
  • After compression 19.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25.7 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rothewood images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 205 B

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 70.3 kB
  • After minification 70.2 kB
  • After compression 59.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rothewood.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (45%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rothewood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rothewood.com

rothewood.com

411 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

188 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

192 ms

learndash_quiz_front.min.css

learndash_quiz_front.min.css

191 ms

jquery.dropdown.min.css

jquery.dropdown.min.css

194 ms

learndash_lesson_video.min.css

learndash_lesson_video.min.css

196 ms

bundle.min.css

bundle.min.css

195 ms

wp-autosave-public.css

wp-autosave-public.css

249 ms

noty.css

noty.css

252 ms

style.css

style.css

254 ms

style.css

style.css

323 ms

learndash.min.css

learndash.min.css

327 ms

wp-h5p-xapi.css

wp-h5p-xapi.css

258 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

312 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

321 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

257 ms

css

css

28 ms

SURREY-0052-1.jpg

SURREY-0052-1.jpg

207 ms

RICHMOND-0376-1.jpg

RICHMOND-0376-1.jpg

274 ms

SURREY-0119-1.jpg

SURREY-0119-1.jpg

324 ms

1-1.jpg

1-1.jpg

270 ms

Girl-Looking-At-Beetle-400x400.jpg

Girl-Looking-At-Beetle-400x400.jpg

272 ms

flower-divider-long.svg

flower-divider-long.svg

162 ms

hand-spinning-paper-400x400.jpg

hand-spinning-paper-400x400.jpg

275 ms

dome-w-three.jpg

dome-w-three.jpg

333 ms

teacher-badge-icon-400x400.jpg

teacher-badge-icon-400x400.jpg

396 ms

3-400.jpg

3-400.jpg

401 ms

girl-outside-tubes-wood-400x400.jpg

girl-outside-tubes-wood-400x400.jpg

467 ms

chefs-hat-kitchen-icon-400x400.jpg

chefs-hat-kitchen-icon-400x400.jpg

400 ms

rothewood-logo.png

rothewood-logo.png

387 ms

arrow-down.svg

arrow-down.svg

371 ms

flower-background.svg

flower-background.svg

427 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

18 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

45 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

62 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq6R9WXh0ow.ttf

81 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq_p9WXh0ow.ttf

84 ms

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

JTUFjIg1_i6t8kCHKm459Wx7xQYXK0vOoz6jq0N6WXh0ow.ttf

81 ms

Accessibility Review

rothewood.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rothewood.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rothewood.com SEO score

89

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rothewood.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rothewood.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rothewood.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rothewood. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: