4.2 sec in total
75 ms
1.9 sec
2.2 sec
Welcome to rothmanshore.com homepage info - get ready to check Rothman Shore best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about rothmanshore.com
Problems solved both at work and home, with a technology focus. And some parenting thrown in.
Visit rothmanshore.comWe analyzed Rothmanshore.com page load time and found that the first response time was 75 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rothmanshore.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value3.5 s
64/100
25%
Value2.8 s
95/100
10%
Value80 ms
99/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
75 ms
527 ms
131 ms
164 ms
147 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Rothmanshore.com, 15% (8 requests) were made to Jrothmanshore.files.wordpress.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to S1.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) relates to the external source Jrothmanshore.files.wordpress.com.
Page size can be reduced by 650.2 kB (33%)
2.0 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Rothmanshore.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rothman Shore images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 488.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 488.9 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rothmanshore.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 69% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (52%)
48
23
The browser has sent 48 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rothman Shore. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rothmanshore.com
75 ms
rothmanshore.com
527 ms
style.css
131 ms
164 ms
147 ms
style.css
148 ms
videopress-iframe.js
170 ms
8919152.What+I%27m+Reading:%20read
323 ms
gprofiles.js
335 ms
wpgroho.js
148 ms
142 ms
jetpack-carousel.css
141 ms
tiled-gallery.css
140 ms
152 ms
widgets.js
241 ms
134 ms
w.js
234 ms
merriweather.css
14 ms
cropped-img_81771.jpg
345 ms
U8L6ZWl6
309 ms
red-small.png
13 ms
img_2496.jpg
382 ms
img_2500.jpg
525 ms
web-image-2016-01-03-20-15-071.png
328 ms
img_2289.jpg
380 ms
81eyllp1ivl.jpg
522 ms
913hi-ksgjl.jpg
530 ms
img_1788.jpg
581 ms
9897792.jpg
456 ms
gr_red_star_inactive.png
182 ms
widget_logo.gif
293 ms
22249664.jpg
443 ms
1736739.jpg
442 ms
20518815.jpg
442 ms
15819028.jpg
494 ms
Noticons.svg
116 ms
BaABdRAi2AAAA
49 ms
merriweather-bold-webfont.ttf
309 ms
merriweather-regular-webfont.ttf
226 ms
merriweather-light-webfont.ttf
368 ms
hovercard.css
85 ms
services.css
159 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
71 ms
g.gif
383 ms
g.gif
368 ms
g.gif
371 ms
videopress-routes.js
118 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
239 ms
U8L6ZWl6
170 ms
ga.js
138 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
U8L6ZWl6
53 ms
img_0382_hd.original.jpg
224 ms
jot
94 ms
rothmanshore.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rothmanshore.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rothmanshore.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rothmanshore.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rothmanshore.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rothmanshore.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rothman Shore. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: