Access rotter.net. ????? | ????? ????.??

rotter.net screenshot

3

Performance

Renders faster than
20% of other websites
78

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 45% of websites
50

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
19% of websites
69

SEO

Google-friendlier than
28% of websites

First Response

63 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

579 ms

rotter.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rotter.net homepage info - get ready to check Rotter best content for Israel right away, or after learning these important things about rotter.net

??? ?????? ????.?? ???? ????? ??? ?? ??????, ?????, ????? ????? ??????? ?????? ???? ??? ?? ?? ????? ???? ??????

Visit rotter.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rotter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 63 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,690 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.863

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value48.0 s

0/100

10%

rotter.net

63 ms

rotter.net

498 ms

style.css

55 ms

rotter.adn.js

19 ms

wind.js

73 ms

Our browser made a total of 187 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Rotter.net, 10% (18 requests) were made to Rotter.co.il and 6% (11 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Sponser.co.il.

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

3.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Rotter.net main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 101.7 kB

Original 127.5 kB
After minification 127.4 kB
After compression 25.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 101.7 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 26.2 kB

Original 2.9 MB
After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rotter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 223.7 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB
After compression 965.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.7 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 784 B

Original 38.3 kB
After minification 38.3 kB
After compression 37.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rotter.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

174

After Optimization

83

The browser has sent 174 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rotter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 41 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

HE
Encoding

WINDOWS-1255

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rotter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rotter.net main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1255. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

rotter.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rotter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: