Report Summary

  • 94

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

rottmann.net

Redirecting to Rottmann Ventures GmbH

Page Load Speed

922 ms in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

646 ms

Page Rendered

60 ms

rottmann.net screenshot

About Website

Visit rottmann.net now to see the best up-to-date Rottmann content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rottmann.net

Visit rottmann.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Rottmann.net page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 706 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rottmann.net performance score

94

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.2 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rottmann.net

216 ms

rottmann.net

416 ms

Our browser made a total of 2 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Rottmann.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (416 ms) belongs to the original domain Rottmann.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (47%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Rottmann.net main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 138 B

  • Original 304 B
  • After minification 273 B
  • After compression 166 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 117.2 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 950.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rottmann needs image optimization as it can save up to 117.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 828.4 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 989.7 kB
  • After compression 210.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 828.4 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 285.6 kB

  • Original 527.3 kB
  • After minification 505.0 kB
  • After compression 241.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rottmann.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.6 kB or 54% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Accessibility Review

rottmann.net accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

rottmann.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rottmann.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rottmann.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Rottmann.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rottmann. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: