Tools & Wizards About Us
route66club.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 4

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

route66club.com

Route66 Club

Page Load Speed

11.2 sec in total

First Response

807 ms

Resources Loaded

10.1 sec

Page Rendered

331 ms

route66club.com screenshot

About Website

Visit route66club.com now to see the best up-to-date Route66 Club content for Thailand and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about route66club.com

Route66 is the best night club in Thailand at Royal City Avanue (RCA)

Visit route66club.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Route66club.com page load time and found that the first response time was 807 ms and then it took 10.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

route66club.com performance score

4

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value38.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,810 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.429

22/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

route66club.com

807 ms

route66club.com

2858 ms

font-awesome.css

1013 ms

font.css

766 ms

normalize.css

768 ms

Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Route66club.com, 9% (8 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Jnn-pa.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Route66club.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.3 kB (9%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Route66club.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 74.4 kB

  • Original 84.0 kB
  • After minification 36.1 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.9 kB, which is 57% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 76.4 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Route66 Club images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 34.5 kB

  • Original 286.1 kB
  • After minification 286.1 kB
  • After compression 251.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.5 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 58.7 kB
  • After minification 58.7 kB
  • After compression 58.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Route66club.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (61%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Route66 Club. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

route66club.com

route66club.com

807 ms

route66club.com

route66club.com

2858 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1013 ms

font.css

font.css

766 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

768 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

2039 ms

bootstrap-tabs.css

bootstrap-tabs.css

770 ms

bootstrap-radius.css

bootstrap-radius.css

1015 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

perfect-scrollbar.css

1020 ms

jquery.nailthumb.1.1.css

jquery.nailthumb.1.1.css

1023 ms

li-scroller.css

li-scroller.css

1026 ms

swipebox.css

swipebox.css

1264 ms

jplayer.css

jplayer.css

1269 ms

main.css

main.css

1274 ms

css_browser_selector.js

css_browser_selector.js

1277 ms

modernizr-2.8.2.js

modernizr-2.8.2.js

2043 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

2523 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

1525 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2032 ms

js

js

71 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js

779 ms

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js

1027 ms

jquery.form.js

jquery.form.js

1543 ms

jquery.validate.js

jquery.validate.js

1537 ms

jquery.validate.bootstrap-tooltip.js

jquery.validate.bootstrap-tooltip.js

1533 ms

touchswipe.min.js

touchswipe.min.js

1537 ms

jquery.cycle2.js

jquery.cycle2.js

2050 ms

jquery.cycle2.swipe.js

jquery.cycle2.swipe.js

1789 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

1793 ms

jquery.nailthumb.1.1.js

jquery.nailthumb.1.1.js

1794 ms

perfect-scrollbar.js

perfect-scrollbar.js

2054 ms

jquery.li-scroller.1.0.js

jquery.li-scroller.1.0.js

2022 ms

jquery.swipebox.js

jquery.swipebox.js

2298 ms

jquery.jplayer.min.js

jquery.jplayer.min.js

2301 ms

facebook.func.js

facebook.func.js

2049 ms

function.func.js

function.func.js

2277 ms

google-analytics.js

google-analytics.js

2305 ms

babas-neue.css

babas-neue.css

2302 ms

open-sans.css

open-sans.css

2305 ms

element.css

element.css

2014 ms

base.css

base.css

2038 ms

class.css

class.css

2041 ms

custom.css

custom.css

2044 ms

background.jpg

background.jpg

298 ms

header-logo.png

header-logo.png

298 ms

98f13708210194c475687be6106a3b84.jpg

98f13708210194c475687be6106a3b84.jpg

3052 ms

af92d2b2b91d6d47592afc5e11f70b98.jpg

af92d2b2b91d6d47592afc5e11f70b98.jpg

703 ms

cdca172f6511342ba7b9bf4a6e9432cd.jpg

cdca172f6511342ba7b9bf4a6e9432cd.jpg

812 ms

af92d2b2b91d6d47592afc5e11f70b98.jpg

af92d2b2b91d6d47592afc5e11f70b98.jpg

811 ms

0599d253fea76b1719480d60611e6377.jpg

0599d253fea76b1719480d60611e6377.jpg

925 ms

eb160de1de89d9058fcb0b968dbbbd68.png

eb160de1de89d9058fcb0b968dbbbd68.png

3349 ms

c45147dee729311ef5b5c3003946c48f.jpg

c45147dee729311ef5b5c3003946c48f.jpg

2005 ms

2b44928ae11fb9384c4cf38708677c48.jpg

2b44928ae11fb9384c4cf38708677c48.jpg

2223 ms

5fd0b37cd7dbbb00f97ba6ce92bf5add.jpg

5fd0b37cd7dbbb00f97ba6ce92bf5add.jpg

2485 ms

73278a4a86960eeb576a8fd4c9ec6997.jpg

73278a4a86960eeb576a8fd4c9ec6997.jpg

2426 ms

7f6ffaa6bb0b408017b62254211691b5.jpg

7f6ffaa6bb0b408017b62254211691b5.jpg

3015 ms

LINE_Icon.png

LINE_Icon.png

2478 ms

1477946160_square-facebook.png

1477946160_square-facebook.png

2683 ms

1477946140_square-twitter.png

1477946140_square-twitter.png

2733 ms

1477946226_instagram.png

1477946226_instagram.png

2994 ms

I-nRdGqWQYo

I-nRdGqWQYo

199 ms

SV1NNav8ASw

SV1NNav8ASw

692 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

64 ms

155 ms

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

3056 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

3107 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

3647 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

3382 ms

OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff

3173 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

3312 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

3614 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

9 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

45 ms

js

js

436 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

24 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

57 ms

base.js

base.js

103 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

475 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

397 ms

mxtTbBhlryF2cIkAezdGpVGDn6_laFF5PR-N71KDL7w.js

mxtTbBhlryF2cIkAezdGpVGDn6_laFF5PR-N71KDL7w.js

253 ms

embed.js

embed.js

197 ms

id

id

62 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

313 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

315 ms

Create

Create

297 ms

Create

Create

438 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

17 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

19 ms

log_event

log_event

20 ms

log_event

log_event

17 ms

Accessibility Review

route66club.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

route66club.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

route66club.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Route66club.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Route66club.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

route66club.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Route66 Club. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: