Tools & Wizards About Us
routerip.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

routerip.net

R&T_ip - TCP/IP, network administration

Page Load Speed

562 ms in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

227 ms

Page Rendered

293 ms

routerip.net screenshot

About Website

Visit routerip.net now to see the best up-to-date Router Ip content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about routerip.net

TCP/IP, network administration

Visit routerip.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Routerip.net page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 520 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

routerip.net performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

85/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.062

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

routerip.net

42 ms

routerip.net

68 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

6 ms

style.min.css

9 ms

classic-themes.min.css

12 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Routerip.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (69 ms) belongs to the original domain Routerip.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 169.4 kB (65%)

Content Size

259.5 kB

After Optimization

90.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Routerip.net main page is 259.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 139.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 122.2 kB

  • Original 139.7 kB
  • After minification 107.7 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 32.0 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 42.9 kB

  • Original 76.8 kB
  • After minification 33.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Router Ip needs image optimization as it can save up to 42.9 kB or 56% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 43.1 kB
  • After minification 43.1 kB
  • After compression 38.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Routerip.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Router Ip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

routerip.net

routerip.net

42 ms

routerip.net

routerip.net

68 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

6 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

9 ms

classic-themes.min.css

classic-themes.min.css

12 ms

4a64b598ff99397b74a3195adcb0f153.css

4a64b598ff99397b74a3195adcb0f153.css

13 ms

jquery.sidr.dark.css

jquery.sidr.dark.css

13 ms

slick.min.css

slick.min.css

13 ms

style.css

style.css

16 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

27 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

25 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

12 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

13 ms

jquery.sidr.min.js

jquery.sidr.min.js

23 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

23 ms

jquery.marquee.min.js

jquery.marquee.min.js

23 ms

ajax.js

ajax.js

23 ms

custom.js

custom.js

69 ms

pagination.js

pagination.js

69 ms

160%D1%85100.png

160%D1%85100.png

38 ms

10news.png

10news.png

38 ms

imgonline-com-ua-Resize-TdKSo6SZy9eC.png

imgonline-com-ua-Resize-TdKSo6SZy9eC.png

38 ms

wordpress-development.png

wordpress-development.png

39 ms

220%D1%85100-1.png

220%D1%85100-1.png

39 ms

Accessibility Review

routerip.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

routerip.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

routerip.net SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Routerip.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Routerip.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

routerip.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Router Ip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: