Tools & Wizards About Us
roversafari.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

roversafari.com

Self drive safaris in Kenya

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

51 ms

Resources Loaded

604 ms

Page Rendered

436 ms

roversafari.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to roversafari.com homepage info - get ready to check Roversafari best content right away, or after learning these important things about roversafari.com

Erikson Rover Safaris offer private, tailor-made, self drive / chauffeur driven 4x4 safaris throughout Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania.

Visit roversafari.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Roversafari.com page load time and found that the first response time was 51 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

roversafari.com performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

32/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

roversafari.com

51 ms

qt=q:95

100 ms

script.js

143 ms

UX.4.34.7.js

18 ms

script.js

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 10% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Roversafari.com, 90% (9 requests) were made to Img1.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (517 ms) relates to the external source Img1.wsimg.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 357.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

962.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Roversafari.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 809.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 74.8 kB

  • Original 90.5 kB
  • After minification 90.5 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.8 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 164 B

  • Original 809.9 kB
  • After minification 809.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Roversafari images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 282.5 kB

  • Original 419.8 kB
  • After minification 419.8 kB
  • After compression 137.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 282.5 kB or 67% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roversafari. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

roversafari.com

roversafari.com

51 ms

qt=q:95

qt=q:95

100 ms

script.js

script.js

143 ms

UX.4.34.7.js

UX.4.34.7.js

18 ms

script.js

script.js

67 ms

rs=w:1920,m

rs=w:1920,m

517 ms

rs=w:600,h:600,cg:true

rs=w:600,h:600,cg:true

178 ms

rs=w:600,h:600,cg:true

rs=w:600,h:600,cg:true

117 ms

rs=w:600,h:300,cg:true

rs=w:600,h:300,cg:true

145 ms

scc-c2.min.js

scc-c2.min.js

166 ms

Accessibility Review

roversafari.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

roversafari.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

roversafari.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roversafari.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Roversafari.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

roversafari.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Roversafari. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: