4.7 sec in total
300 ms
2.2 sec
2.2 sec
Visit rovop.com now to see the best up-to-date ROVOP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rovop.com
Global robotics specialists with an unrivalled track record of reliability and a technologically advanced fleet of subsea ROVs.
Visit rovop.comWe analyzed Rovop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
rovop.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
58/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value8.3 s
19/100
10%
Value12,770 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
300 ms
622 ms
34 ms
327 ms
173 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (9 requests) were addressed to the original Rovop.com, 57% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (768 ms) belongs to the original domain Rovop.com.
Page size can be reduced by 95.7 kB (42%)
229.5 kB
133.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Rovop.com main page is 229.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 113.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 95.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ROVOP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (55%)
11
5
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ROVOP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
rovop.com
300 ms
www.rovop.com
622 ms
css
34 ms
jquery.min.js
327 ms
gtm.js
173 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
320 ms
hooks.min.js
420 ms
i18n.min.js
422 ms
9ec58291926eb39f8861c2c6b93e318f.js
768 ms
3a88ea6bb46b02619eb86738c499b7b5.css
561 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
152 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
153 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
250 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
268 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
265 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
265 ms
_Xmt-HQyrTKWaw25jKOe.woff
130 ms
_Xmu-HQyrTKWaw2xN4aND65u.woff
129 ms
analytics.js
135 ms
collect
60 ms
bg.jpg
415 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aXw.woff
24 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
25 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aXw.woff
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aXw.woff
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aXw.woff
27 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
36 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aXw.woff
37 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aXw.woff
38 ms
rovop.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
rovop.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rovop.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rovop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rovop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rovop.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ROVOP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: