5.6 sec in total
1.1 sec
4.4 sec
199 ms
Welcome to roxonet.com homepage info - get ready to check Roxonet best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about roxonet.com
Since 2003, REGTR has established itself in the industry by providing domain name registration, web hosting, and cloud server services. With its rich experience and customer-oriented approach, REGTR a...
Visit roxonet.comWe analyzed Roxonet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
roxonet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.0 s
0/100
10%
Value35.5 s
0/100
25%
Value27.5 s
0/100
10%
Value1,860 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value17.5 s
4/100
10%
1094 ms
563 ms
436 ms
434 ms
442 ms
Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Roxonet.com, 4% (3 requests) were made to V2.zopim.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Roxonet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 815.2 kB (43%)
1.9 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Roxonet.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.4 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 412.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Roxonet needs image optimization as it can save up to 412.5 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 228.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 228.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 145.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Roxonet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 145.9 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)
70
41
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Roxonet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
roxonet.com
1094 ms
jquery.js
563 ms
bootstrap.css
436 ms
crestu.css
434 ms
crestu-menu.css
442 ms
hosting-tablo.css
443 ms
jquery.selectbox.css
445 ms
jquery-1.7.2.min.js
705 ms
bootstrap.js
584 ms
whmcs.js
583 ms
cufon-yui.js
585 ms
00370_400.font.js
591 ms
jquery.toggleformtext.js
687 ms
checkbox.js
697 ms
jquery.selectbox-0.1.3.js
725 ms
jcarousellite_1.0.1c4.js
726 ms
default.css
729 ms
nivo-slider.css
816 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
826 ms
crestu.js
834 ms
ga.js
48 ms
roxonetanabg.jpg
359 ms
header.jpg
971 ms
logo.png
523 ms
topBg.png
223 ms
icon-anasayfa.png
212 ms
icon-panel.png
203 ms
icon-destek.png
382 ms
icon-sepet.png
389 ms
icon-iletisim.png
442 ms
altbaslik.jpg
432 ms
linuxhosting.png
946 ms
nav-left.png
947 ms
linuxbayi.png
947 ms
radyohosting.png
945 ms
sponsorhosting.png
663 ms
kiraliksunucu.png
947 ms
linuxvps.png
947 ms
windowsvps.png
947 ms
menualanadi.jpg
967 ms
sosyalmedya.png
1032 ms
webtasarim.png
1131 ms
icerikyonetimi.png
1086 ms
hazirsite.png
1072 ms
internettv.png
1251 ms
loading.gif
1242 ms
cloudbanner.jpg
1415 ms
duyurular.jpg
1204 ms
sorgula.png
1242 ms
homelinuxweb.jpg
1391 ms
homelinuxbayi.jpg
1600 ms
homewindowsweb.jpg
1519 ms
homewindowsbayi.jpg
1523 ms
webmailsag.png
1624 ms
hostpanelsag.png
1715 ms
geriiade.jpg
1545 ms
musterimemnuniyet.jpg
1645 ms
00287-crestu.woff
1470 ms
faaliyetbelgesi.jpg
1488 ms
sss.png
1530 ms
widget_v2.132.js
9 ms
__$$__stringtable_lang_tr.js
12 ms
uptimegarantisi.png
1485 ms
onlineodeme.png
1436 ms
footer.jpg
1425 ms
footerlogo.png
1398 ms
check-on.png
1447 ms
check-off.png
1546 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
72 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
0 ms
arrows.png
307 ms
bullets.png
154 ms
roxonet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
roxonet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
roxonet.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
TR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Roxonet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Turkish language. Our system also found out that Roxonet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
roxonet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Roxonet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: