Tools & Wizards About Us
royal.net.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 50

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

royal.net.in

Royal Bed Protector (chennai bed protector, chennai beddings, chennai royal bed protector, chennai water proof mattress, chennai mattress protector, c...

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

716 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

164 ms

royal.net.in screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Royal content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about royal.net.in

chennai bed protector, chennai beddings, chennai royal bed protector, chennai water proof mattress, chennai mattress protector, chennai mattress, chennai mattresses, chennai bed wetting protector, che...

Visit royal.net.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Royal.net.in page load time and found that the first response time was 716 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royal.net.in performance score

50

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.6 s

52/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.138

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royal.net.in

716 ms

bootstrap.css

125 ms

style.css

119 ms

style1.css

118 ms

script.js

121 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Royal.net.in, 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (716 ms) belongs to the original domain Royal.net.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 140.2 kB (20%)

Content Size

707.8 kB

After Optimization

567.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royal.net.in main page is 707.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 544.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 19.9 kB

  • Original 23.3 kB
  • After minification 15.4 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 85.1 kB

  • Original 544.9 kB
  • After minification 459.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Royal needs image optimization as it can save up to 85.1 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

  • Original 99.9 kB
  • After minification 99.8 kB
  • After compression 81.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 16.5 kB

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 39.8 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royal.net.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.5 kB or 41% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (44%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royal.net.in

royal.net.in

716 ms

bootstrap.css

bootstrap.css

125 ms

style.css

style.css

119 ms

style1.css

style1.css

118 ms

script.js

script.js

121 ms

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

jquery-1.8.3.min.js

178 ms

jquery.ba-resize.min.js

jquery.ba-resize.min.js

121 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

178 ms

jquery.animate-colors-min.js

jquery.animate-colors-min.js

180 ms

jquery.backgroundpos.min.js

jquery.backgroundpos.min.js

180 ms

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

jquery.cycle.all.min.js

183 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

183 ms

bgStretch.js

bgStretch.js

242 ms

forms.js

forms.js

239 ms

sImg.js

sImg.js

239 ms

uCarousel.js

uCarousel.js

240 ms

uScroll.js

uScroll.js

243 ms

hoverSprite.js

hoverSprite.js

243 ms

sprites.js

sprites.js

299 ms

scroll_to_top.js

scroll_to_top.js

301 ms

ajax.js.switch.js

ajax.js.switch.js

302 ms

jquery.backgroundpos.js

jquery.backgroundpos.js

302 ms

css

css

21 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

185 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

background.png

background.png

66 ms

contact.png

contact.png

339 ms

header_bg.png

header_bg.png

69 ms

logo_plane.png

logo_plane.png

66 ms

logo.png

logo.png

126 ms

menu_sign1.png

menu_sign1.png

69 ms

home_sign.png

home_sign.png

127 ms

splash_pic1.jpg

splash_pic1.jpg

297 ms

terry.jpg

terry.jpg

131 ms

coral.jpg

coral.jpg

129 ms

topper.jpg

topper.jpg

187 ms

protect.jpg

protect.jpg

245 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

189 ms

banner2.jpg

banner2.jpg

248 ms

list_marker.png

list_marker.png

249 ms

page2_pic2.jpg

page2_pic2.jpg

307 ms

onlineshopping.gif

onlineshopping.gif

309 ms

amazon.jpg

amazon.jpg

310 ms

ebay.jpg

ebay.jpg

309 ms

snapdeal.jpg

snapdeal.jpg

358 ms

paytm.jpg

paytm.jpg

367 ms

footer_bg.png

footer_bg.png

426 ms

soc_icon_1.png

soc_icon_1.png

369 ms

soc_icon_2.png

soc_icon_2.png

370 ms

soc_icon_3.png

soc_icon_3.png

397 ms

soc_icon_4.png

soc_icon_4.png

417 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

15 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

15 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

18 ms

collect

collect

29 ms

js

js

65 ms

Accessibility Review

royal.net.in accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

royal.net.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

royal.net.in SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royal.net.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royal.net.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royal.net.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: