Tools & Wizards About Us
royalcovers.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

royalcovers.com

Royal Covers - Arizona's Premier Patio Cover Installer

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

154 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

436 ms

royalcovers.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to royalcovers.com homepage info - get ready to check Royal Covers best content right away, or after learning these important things about royalcovers.com

Royal Covers is licensed, bonded & insured to exceed your expectations. We provide top quality patio covers & pergola covers in Phoenix, Arizona.

Visit royalcovers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Royalcovers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 154 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royalcovers.com performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

48/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.4 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.153

75/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royalcovers.com

154 ms

royalcovers.com

279 ms

google-review.css

160 ms

css

42 ms

style.css

21 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Royalcovers.com, 81% (39 requests) were made to Royalcovers.b-cdn.net and 10% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (596 ms) relates to the external source Royalcovers.b-cdn.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 230.5 kB (27%)

Content Size

856.7 kB

After Optimization

626.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royalcovers.com main page is 856.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 538.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 213.2 kB

  • Original 259.4 kB
  • After minification 259.3 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 213.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 538.2 kB
  • After minification 530.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal Covers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 259 B

  • Original 3.9 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 55.1 kB
  • After minification 55.1 kB
  • After compression 45.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalcovers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (40%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Covers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royalcovers.com

royalcovers.com

154 ms

royalcovers.com

royalcovers.com

279 ms

google-review.css

google-review.css

160 ms

css

css

42 ms

style.css

style.css

21 ms

main.css

main.css

21 ms

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

et-divi-customizer-global.min.css

323 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

4 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

166 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

10 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

6 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

11 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

194 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

177 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

129 ms

royal-covers_logo-2.png

royal-covers_logo-2.png

54 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

339 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FsOs.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pa8FsOs.ttf

42 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pbYF8Os.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pbYF8Os.ttf

55 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pb0EMOs.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pb0EMOs.ttf

68 ms

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7q4A.ttf

LDIxapCSOBg7S-QT7q4A.ttf

68 ms

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pasEcOs.ttf

LDI2apCSOBg7S-QT7pasEcOs.ttf

68 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

30 ms

equinox-louvered-roof-16hin2318-9_web.jpg

equinox-louvered-roof-16hin2318-9_web.jpg

363 ms

bbb-acredited-business.png

bbb-acredited-business.png

45 ms

home-advisor-five-star-rating.png

home-advisor-five-star-rating.png

35 ms

proudly-featured-on-houzz.png

proudly-featured-on-houzz.png

61 ms

local-first-arizona.png

local-first-arizona.png

142 ms

rchome2.jpg

rchome2.jpg

187 ms

five-stars.png

five-stars.png

74 ms

listen360.png

listen360.png

284 ms

google.png

google.png

200 ms

yelp.png

yelp.png

172 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

223 ms

testimonial-stars.png

testimonial-stars.png

345 ms

138E0DB8-3DEC-42B6-8875-0FC47CE865DF_1_105_c-400x250.jpeg

138E0DB8-3DEC-42B6-8875-0FC47CE865DF_1_105_c-400x250.jpeg

236 ms

529BBAF2-A4DF-4095-AE67-58E8F9EC26C1_1_105_c-400x250.jpeg

529BBAF2-A4DF-4095-AE67-58E8F9EC26C1_1_105_c-400x250.jpeg

271 ms

7A1A38BC-78CD-4EED-B1E9-1419D25FFDEE_1_105_c-400x250.jpeg

7A1A38BC-78CD-4EED-B1E9-1419D25FFDEE_1_105_c-400x250.jpeg

428 ms

royal-covers-phone.png

royal-covers-phone.png

422 ms

royal-covers-email.png

royal-covers-email.png

431 ms

royal-covers-location.png

royal-covers-location.png

495 ms

listen-360.png

listen-360.png

363 ms

google-plus.png

google-plus.png

596 ms

yelp-royal-covers.png

yelp-royal-covers.png

516 ms

facebook-royal-covers.png

facebook-royal-covers.png

460 ms

five-star-rating-home-advisor.png

five-star-rating-home-advisor.png

554 ms

proudly-featured-houzz.png

proudly-featured-houzz.png

570 ms

lfa.png

lfa.png

564 ms

Accessibility Review

royalcovers.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

royalcovers.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

royalcovers.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalcovers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalcovers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royalcovers.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Royal Covers. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: