15 sec in total
7 sec
7.7 sec
307 ms
Click here to check amazing Royal Sheet content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about royalsheet.com
Visit royalsheet.comWe analyzed Royalsheet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 7 sec and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
royalsheet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.8 s
0/100
10%
Value51.1 s
0/100
25%
Value23.3 s
0/100
10%
Value680 ms
44/100
30%
Value0.216
58/100
15%
Value25.0 s
0/100
10%
7032 ms
138 ms
47 ms
63 ms
48 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Royalsheet.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (7 sec) belongs to the original domain Royalsheet.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (78%)
3.2 MB
712.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Royalsheet.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Royal Sheet needs image optimization as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 796.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 796.6 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.6 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royalsheet.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 MB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (87%)
61
8
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Sheet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 27 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royalsheet.com
7032 ms
style.min.css
138 ms
styles.css
47 ms
settings.css
63 ms
fontello.css
48 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
65 ms
woocommerce.css
226 ms
style.css
106 ms
css
24 ms
fontello.css
69 ms
style.css
91 ms
core.animation.css
92 ms
theme.shortcodes.css
134 ms
plugin.tribe-events.css
115 ms
plugin.woocommerce.css
115 ms
skin.css
157 ms
custom-style.css
129 ms
responsive.css
129 ms
skin.responsive.css
154 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
146 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
175 ms
js_composer.min.css
176 ms
plugin.contact-form-7.css
175 ms
jquery.min.js
204 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
193 ms
rbtools.min.js
202 ms
rs6.min.js
293 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
192 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
196 ms
js.cookie.min.js
211 ms
woocommerce.min.js
212 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
281 ms
css
42 ms
wc-blocks.css
287 ms
animate.min.css
287 ms
rs6.css
286 ms
index.js
290 ms
index.js
288 ms
trx_utils.js
276 ms
sourcebuster.min.js
250 ms
order-attribution.min.js
250 ms
modernizr.min.js
272 ms
superfish.js
270 ms
jquery.slidemenu.js
265 ms
core.utils.js
243 ms
core.init.js
242 ms
theme.init.js
223 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
266 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
219 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
211 ms
social-share.js
205 ms
theme.shortcodes.js
252 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
199 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
238 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
184 ms
loader-1.gif
47 ms
rsm_logo.png
96 ms
dummy.png
94 ms
highlight_cnc-machining.jpg
56 ms
highlight_laser-cutitng.jpg
55 ms
highlight-metal-forming.jpg
99 ms
community-banner.jpg
101 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGd4Ag.woff
49 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERKSiw.woff
49 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERKSiw.woff
162 ms
fontello.woff
96 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI5wq_FQfr.woff
43 ms
S6u8w4BMUTPHjxsAUi-s.woff
45 ms
S6u_w4BMUTPHjxsI9w2_FQfr.woff
46 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHw.woff
44 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWA.woff
45 ms
S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHw.woff
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
93 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
93 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
162 ms
JTUSjIg69CK48gW7PXoo9WlhzQ.woff
163 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
55 ms
royalsheet.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
royalsheet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
royalsheet.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royalsheet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royalsheet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royalsheet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royal Sheet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: