Tools & Wizards About Us
royaltonwhitesandsresort.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 55

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

Royalton White Sands Resort – Montego Bay – Royalton Montego Bay All Inclusive Resort

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

147 ms

Resources Loaded

688 ms

Page Rendered

333 ms

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com screenshot

About Website

Visit royaltonwhitesandsresort.com now to see the best up-to-date Royalton White Sands Resort content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

Royalton White Sands Beach Resort - Montego Bay, Royalton All Inclusive Jamaica - Call Toll Free: 1-888-774-0040 or Book Online

Visit royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com page load time and found that the first response time was 147 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

31/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.9 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value220 ms

87/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.337

33/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

147 ms

www.royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

183 ms

css

36 ms

segmentos.css

40 ms

style.css

82 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com, 9% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (187 ms) belongs to the original domain Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 85.3 kB (8%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

991.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 867.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 34.7 kB

  • Original 41.3 kB
  • After minification 36.2 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 301 B

  • Original 867.2 kB
  • After minification 866.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royalton White Sands Resort images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 27.2 kB

  • Original 115.4 kB
  • After minification 115.4 kB
  • After compression 88.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 27.2 kB or 24% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 23.1 kB

  • Original 53.1 kB
  • After minification 53.1 kB
  • After compression 30.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 44% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (40%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royalton White Sands Resort. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

147 ms

www.royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

www.royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

183 ms

css

css

36 ms

segmentos.css

segmentos.css

40 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

ficha_hotel.css

ficha_hotel.css

102 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

jquery-ui.min.css

100 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

98 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

135 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

100 ms

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js

jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js

125 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

177 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

176 ms

js

js

57 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

175 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

187 ms

top_main.png

top_main.png

122 ms

menu_bars.png

menu_bars.png

122 ms

icon_mobile_menu.png

icon_mobile_menu.png

122 ms

slide-23.jpg

slide-23.jpg

129 ms

slide-25.jpg

slide-25.jpg

133 ms

slide-26.jpg

slide-26.jpg

124 ms

slide-31.jpg

slide-31.jpg

133 ms

gallery-1-thumb.jpg

gallery-1-thumb.jpg

122 ms

gallery-2-thumb.jpg

gallery-2-thumb.jpg

121 ms

gallery-3-thumb.jpg

gallery-3-thumb.jpg

124 ms

gallery-4-thumb.jpg

gallery-4-thumb.jpg

125 ms

accommodations.jpg

accommodations.jpg

134 ms

1x1_texthg.png

1x1_texthg.png

136 ms

restaurant.jpg

restaurant.jpg

173 ms

all_inclusive.jpg

all_inclusive.jpg

168 ms

slider_dots.png

slider_dots.png

68 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwiPHw.woff

22 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWA.woff

35 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AXC-s.woff

36 ms

Accessibility Review

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com accessibility score

55

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royaltonwhitesandsresort.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

royaltonwhitesandsresort.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royalton White Sands Resort. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: