6.6 sec in total
479 ms
5.6 sec
592 ms
Visit royaltrader.net now to see the best up-to-date Royal Trader content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about royaltrader.net
Visit royaltrader.netWe analyzed Royaltrader.net page load time and found that the first response time was 479 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
royaltrader.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
16/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value2,710 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.017
100/100
15%
Value20.9 s
2/100
10%
479 ms
2200 ms
573 ms
582 ms
586 ms
Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Royaltrader.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Royaltrader.net.
Page size can be reduced by 418.5 kB (13%)
3.3 MB
2.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Royaltrader.net main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 144.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 144.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 271.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Royal Trader images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 790 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Royaltrader.net has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (75%)
59
15
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Royal Trader. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
royaltrader.net
479 ms
royaltrader.net
2200 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
573 ms
main.css
582 ms
style.min.css
586 ms
classic-themes.min.css
589 ms
styles.css
589 ms
public.css
594 ms
blocks.css
768 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
774 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
781 ms
swiper.min.css
780 ms
post-3232.css
784 ms
global.css
792 ms
post-3193.css
972 ms
css2
24 ms
style.min.css
1163 ms
css
35 ms
jquery.min.js
1296 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
974 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
810 ms
counter.css
734 ms
animations.min.css
807 ms
app.js
806 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
808 ms
masonry.min.js
1029 ms
index.js
1029 ms
index.js
1030 ms
events.js
1030 ms
public.js
1030 ms
postsTab.js
1123 ms
api.js
69 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
1136 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1186 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1195 ms
index.js
1201 ms
main.js
1397 ms
jquery-numerator.min.js
1318 ms
waypoints.min.js
1333 ms
counter.js
1378 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1390 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1198 ms
core.min.js
1306 ms
frontend.min.js
1328 ms
underscore.min.js
1358 ms
wp-util.min.js
1371 ms
frontend.min.js
1374 ms
1af59774-8433-4a7b-b248-a10ae97f461e.jpg
997 ms
handshake_190617.jpg
1110 ms
wheat-1.jpg
1736 ms
Spices-1.jpg
1355 ms
onion.jpg
1374 ms
rice-2-1.jpg
1593 ms
pulses.png
1783 ms
Red-Chilli.png
1893 ms
Poly.png
1564 ms
Poly1.png
1570 ms
unsplash_2vPGGOU-wLA.jpg
1757 ms
1af59774-8433-4a7b-b248-a10ae97f461e-2-1024x643.jpg
1765 ms
font
15 ms
recaptcha__en.js
21 ms
royaltrader.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
royaltrader.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
royaltrader.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Royaltrader.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Royaltrader.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
royaltrader.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Royal Trader. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: