7.3 sec in total
259 ms
4.3 sec
2.7 sec
Visit rpcs.com now to see the best up-to-date RP Cs content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rpcs.com
Solar Tracker Project Design, Supply, and Installation for Leading U.S. Solar Companies Nationwide | RP Construction Services
Visit rpcs.comWe analyzed Rpcs.com page load time and found that the first response time was 259 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rpcs.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value7.1 s
5/100
25%
Value10.5 s
8/100
10%
Value920 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.308
38/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
259 ms
885 ms
72 ms
164 ms
243 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Rpcs.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpcs.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (9%)
11.6 MB
10.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Rpcs.com main page is 11.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 10.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 170.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 170.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 873.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RP Cs images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 39.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 39.3 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 19.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpcs.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (70%)
64
19
The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RP Cs. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rpcs.com
259 ms
www.rpcs.com
885 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
72 ms
style.min.css
164 ms
styles.css
243 ms
dae.css
249 ms
download.css
257 ms
dashicons.min.css
339 ms
all.css
273 ms
rgs.css
292 ms
font-awesome.min.css
294 ms
style.css
511 ms
magnific.css
301 ms
responsive.css
339 ms
ascend.css
353 ms
js_composer.min.css
357 ms
css
46 ms
jquery.min.js
458 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
375 ms
modernizr.js
400 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
398 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
437 ms
animate.min.css
435 ms
core.min.js
442 ms
menu.min.js
455 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
805 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
804 ms
dom-ready.min.js
804 ms
hooks.min.js
805 ms
i18n.min.js
805 ms
a11y.min.js
806 ms
autocomplete.min.js
805 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
806 ms
index.js
807 ms
dae.js
806 ms
media-query.js
807 ms
download.js
807 ms
magnific.js
808 ms
superfish.js
807 ms
init.js
887 ms
touchswipe.min.js
687 ms
wp-embed.min.js
617 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
610 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
604 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
567 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
545 ms
analytics.js
230 ms
RPCS_logo-small.png
198 ms
RPCS_logo-750-wide.png
198 ms
array-technologies.jpg
312 ms
diagonal_line.png
196 ms
2022-TSC-no-border.png
1070 ms
DSC_2268.jpg
1099 ms
Barnwell-LR.jpg
1065 ms
Whytheville-2.jpg
1067 ms
Lost-Hills.jpg
1071 ms
G0231364.jpg
2129 ms
ATI_DuraTrack_Project_AJO_AZ.jpg
1072 ms
Inc.-5000-Color-Medallion-Logo-300x300.png
1083 ms
2022-TSC-no-border-300x143.png
1085 ms
798d68f4a2c414544d2cebd1b.js
390 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
117 ms
OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff
918 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
117 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
918 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
288 ms
OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff
889 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
288 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
889 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
915 ms
collect
235 ms
collect
823 ms
embed.js
129 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
76 ms
ga-audiences
110 ms
rpcs.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rpcs.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rpcs.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpcs.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpcs.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rpcs.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of RP Cs. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: