4.7 sec in total
288 ms
3.7 sec
643 ms
Visit rpfn.no now to see the best up-to-date Rpfn content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rpfn.no
Vi ønsker å spre informasjon om øyesykdommen Retinitis Pigmentosa. Medlemsskap i foreningen er åpen for alle med interesse for denne sykdommen.
Visit rpfn.noWe analyzed Rpfn.no page load time and found that the first response time was 288 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rpfn.no performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value8.1 s
20/100
10%
Value260 ms
83/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value8.5 s
38/100
10%
288 ms
2639 ms
57 ms
549 ms
278 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Rpfn.no, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpfn.no.
Page size can be reduced by 504.0 kB (49%)
1.0 MB
534.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Rpfn.no main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 405.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 79.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rpfn images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 134.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 134.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 285.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpfn.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 285.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (82%)
39
7
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpfn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rpfn.no
288 ms
rpfn.no
2639 ms
gtm.js
57 ms
style.min.css
549 ms
styles.css
278 ms
ivory-search.min.css
278 ms
style.css
279 ms
style.css
280 ms
front.min.css
368 ms
main.css
642 ms
style.css
243 ms
jquery.min.js
424 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
336 ms
wp-hide-post-public.js
336 ms
front.min.js
407 ms
variables-skeleton.min.css
118 ms
variables-full.min.css
118 ms
common-skeleton.min.css
119 ms
common-full.min.css
192 ms
widget-events-list-skeleton.min.css
313 ms
widget-events-list-full.min.css
312 ms
index.js
313 ms
index.js
312 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
314 ms
scripts-navigation-accessibility.js
316 ms
scripts-navigation-mobile.js
328 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
329 ms
scripts-global.js
329 ms
ivory-search.min.js
447 ms
tribe-common.min.js
449 ms
query-string.min.js
451 ms
underscore-before.js
450 ms
underscore.min.js
449 ms
underscore-after.js
449 ms
manager.min.js
451 ms
breakpoints.min.js
478 ms
rp-logo-3.png
285 ms
forskning-1920x720.jpg
351 ms
forskning-806x453.jpg
550 ms
RP-nytt_2023-3_Thumb.jpg
494 ms
retina-int.gif
201 ms
Genericons-Neue.woff
219 ms
retina-int.gif
133 ms
rpfn.no accessibility score
rpfn.no best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rpfn.no SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NO
NB
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpfn.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpfn.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rpfn.no
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rpfn. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: