Tools & Wizards About Us
rphcc.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rphcc.org

Home | Rapides Primary Heal

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

97 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

202 ms

rphcc.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rphcc content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rphcc.org

Visit rphcc.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rphcc.org page load time and found that the first response time was 97 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rphcc.org performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

12/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

74/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value690 ms

43/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.351

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rphcc.org

97 ms

rphcc.org

513 ms

style.css

76 ms

css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Rphcc.org, 6% (3 requests) were made to Google.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (523 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.9 kB (32%)

Content Size

97.0 kB

After Optimization

66.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Rphcc.org main page is 97.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 57.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 30.8 kB

  • Original 39.8 kB
  • After minification 38.8 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 126 B

  • Original 57.2 kB
  • After minification 57.2 kB
  • After compression 57.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (39%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

27

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rphcc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rphcc.org

rphcc.org

97 ms

rphcc.org

rphcc.org

513 ms

style.css

style.css

76 ms

css

css

27 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

53 ms

responsiveslides.min.js

responsiveslides.min.js

100 ms

jquery.slicknav.min.js

jquery.slicknav.min.js

104 ms

jquery.slicknav.js

jquery.slicknav.js

114 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

216 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

189 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

192 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

134 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

175 ms

css

css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

231 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

227 ms

simple-job-board-public.css

simple-job-board-public.css

278 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

234 ms

head-pic.png

head-pic.png

113 ms

logo.png

logo.png

138 ms

home-banner01.jpg

home-banner01.jpg

152 ms

home-banner02.jpg

home-banner02.jpg

153 ms

sb-alex.png

sb-alex.png

149 ms

sb-bunk.png

sb-bunk.png

156 ms

sb-medical.jpg

sb-medical.jpg

227 ms

sb-dental.jpg

sb-dental.jpg

228 ms

sb-mental.jpg

sb-mental.jpg

228 ms

mission-box.png

mission-box.png

229 ms

DSC_5072-min-300x200.jpg

DSC_5072-min-300x200.jpg

230 ms

DSC_5017-min-300x200.jpg

DSC_5017-min-300x200.jpg

229 ms

forall.jpg

forall.jpg

231 ms

embed

embed

394 ms

embed

embed

523 ms

head-bg.jpg

head-bg.jpg

58 ms

box-l.jpg

box-l.jpg

59 ms

box-m.jpg

box-m.jpg

60 ms

box-r.jpg

box-r.jpg

63 ms

foot-bg.jpg

foot-bg.jpg

79 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

31 ms

banner-arrow-left.png

banner-arrow-left.png

48 ms

banner-arrow-right.png

banner-arrow-right.png

48 ms

trajanpro-regular.woff

trajanpro-regular.woff

112 ms

myriadpro-regular.woff

myriadpro-regular.woff

45 ms

collect

collect

13 ms

collect

collect

87 ms

js

js

90 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

92 ms

js

js

59 ms

Accessibility Review

rphcc.org accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rphcc.org best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rphcc.org SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rphcc.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rphcc.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rphcc.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rphcc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: