Tools & Wizards About Us
rpimaging.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    41% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 69

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rpimaging.com

RPimaging - Your Source for Color Matching Products

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

816 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

rpimaging.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RPimaging content for Egypt. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rpimaging.com

Shop RPimaging for color management hardware and software such as light booths, spectrophotometers, and RIP programs. RPimaging also helps you achieve the correct color through training and other serv...

Visit rpimaging.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rpimaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 816 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rpimaging.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,960 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.rpimaging.com

816 ms

acde64ba5bdd9c02a0d0cc144b0c52eb-1-1455209703.css

591 ms

791dcbc189c147f4f7f368896fea2daa-1455209703.js

624 ms

dc.js

46 ms

analytics.js

13 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Rpimaging.com, 35% (14 requests) were made to Cdn01.rpimaging.com and 8% (3 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Rpimaging.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (66%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

532.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rpimaging.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 46.0 kB

  • Original 59.4 kB
  • After minification 53.7 kB
  • After compression 13.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.0 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 135.8 kB
  • After minification 128.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RPimaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 701.2 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 322.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 701.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 272.6 kB

  • Original 340.6 kB
  • After minification 338.8 kB
  • After compression 68.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpimaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 272.6 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (32%)

Requests Now

38

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 38 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RPimaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.rpimaging.com

www.rpimaging.com

816 ms

acde64ba5bdd9c02a0d0cc144b0c52eb-1-1455209703.css

acde64ba5bdd9c02a0d0cc144b0c52eb-1-1455209703.css

591 ms

791dcbc189c147f4f7f368896fea2daa-1455209703.js

791dcbc189c147f4f7f368896fea2daa-1455209703.js

624 ms

dc.js

dc.js

46 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

13 ms

bg-body.png

bg-body.png

39 ms

getseal

getseal

154 ms

101.gif

101.gif

254 ms

rpimaging-20003969.png

rpimaging-20003969.png

212 ms

217 ms

al.gif

al.gif

62 ms

opc-ajax-loader.gif

opc-ajax-loader.gif

52 ms

rpimaging_logo.png

rpimaging_logo.png

65 ms

logo-print.png

logo-print.png

52 ms

call-iocn.png

call-iocn.png

65 ms

gradients.png

gradients.png

64 ms

bg_images.png

bg_images.png

64 ms

homepage4.jpg

homepage4.jpg

104 ms

homepage5.jpg

homepage5.jpg

144 ms

scanner_bubble.png

scanner_bubble.png

100 ms

loader0.js

loader0.js

77 ms

collect

collect

6 ms

collect

collect

72 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

159 ms

arrows.png

arrows.png

71 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

35 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

22 ms

1580-884-10-5668.js

1580-884-10-5668.js

29 ms

c

c

109 ms

getseal

getseal

155 ms

bat.js

bat.js

178 ms

49 ms

klevu-webstore.js

klevu-webstore.js

35 ms

klevu-14309131614181310.js

klevu-14309131614181310.js

212 ms

29 ms

rounded-white.png

rounded-white.png

29 ms

s.js

s.js

29 ms

application2.js

application2.js

79 ms

loader_white.gif

loader_white.gif

33 ms

i.gif

i.gif

7 ms

Accessibility Review

rpimaging.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rpimaging.com best practices score

69

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rpimaging.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpimaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpimaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rpimaging.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RPimaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: