Tools & Wizards About Us
rpltechnologyservices.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rpltechnologyservices.com

Innovative Technology Solutions - RPL Technology Services W.L.L.

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

3.8 sec

Page Rendered

252 ms

rpltechnologyservices.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing RPL Technology Services content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rpltechnologyservices.com

RPL Technology Services W.L.L. is one of the leading and innovative technology solutions and service providers of IPTV, SMATV, CCTV, Surveillance systems and other IT/Networking solutions in Bahrain a...

Visit rpltechnologyservices.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rpltechnologyservices.com page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rpltechnologyservices.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.4 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value330 ms

75/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rpltechnologyservices.com

163 ms

rpltechnologyservices.com

1020 ms

enyii.css

133 ms

helpers.css

201 ms

global.css

739 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Rpltechnologyservices.com, 13% (10 requests) were made to S.enterocms.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpltechnologyservices.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (61%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rpltechnologyservices.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 48.6 kB

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.8 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 94.7 kB

  • Original 755.2 kB
  • After minification 660.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, RPL Technology Services needs image optimization as it can save up to 94.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 540.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 835.1 kB

  • Original 965.1 kB
  • After minification 796.9 kB
  • After compression 130.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpltechnologyservices.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 835.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (80%)

Requests Now

64

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 64 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RPL Technology Services. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 38 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rpltechnologyservices.com

rpltechnologyservices.com

163 ms

rpltechnologyservices.com

rpltechnologyservices.com

1020 ms

enyii.css

enyii.css

133 ms

helpers.css

helpers.css

201 ms

global.css

global.css

739 ms

structure.css

structure.css

474 ms

be_style.css

be_style.css

486 ms

settings.css

settings.css

355 ms

settings.css

settings.css

358 ms

custom.css

custom.css

292 ms

css

css

17 ms

css

css

29 ms

css

css

31 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

22 ms

structure.css

structure.css

631 ms

interactive.css

interactive.css

421 ms

custom.css

custom.css

424 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

751 ms

map-kit.js

map-kit.js

427 ms

js

js

86 ms

yii.js

yii.js

476 ms

enyii.js

enyii.js

488 ms

jquery.are-you-sure.js

jquery.are-you-sure.js

493 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

610 ms

mfn.menu.js

mfn.menu.js

555 ms

jquery.plugins.js

jquery.plugins.js

802 ms

jquery.jplayer.min.js

jquery.jplayer.min.js

623 ms

animations.js

animations.js

635 ms

translate3d.js

translate3d.js

748 ms

holder.min.js

holder.min.js

749 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

801 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

875 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

801 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

800 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

800 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

895 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

895 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

896 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

896 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

896 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

927 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

929 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

946 ms

revolution.extension.video.min.js

revolution.extension.video.min.js

884 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

820 ms

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

revolution.extension.actions.min.js

728 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

704 ms

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js

703 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

639 ms

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

revolution.extension.migration.min.js

639 ms

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

revolution.extension.parallax.min.js

586 ms

custom.js

custom.js

575 ms

interactive.js

interactive.js

637 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

123 ms

hjKphcu-JYaUE1JTMe_dhpJBQD4_vZuW.jpg

hjKphcu-JYaUE1JTMe_dhpJBQD4_vZuW.jpg

244 ms

K-anAykvQgACUTybJcgNBXgugx_5IzEk.jpg

K-anAykvQgACUTybJcgNBXgugx_5IzEk.jpg

227 ms

TNwx5ojVFB3RRGJF7ILGFbss6IquzCbB.jpg

TNwx5ojVFB3RRGJF7ILGFbss6IquzCbB.jpg

237 ms

kachara2.jpg

kachara2.jpg

245 ms

logo.png

logo.png

248 ms

box_shadow.png

box_shadow.png

358 ms

home_interactive_offerbox_icon.png

home_interactive_offerbox_icon.png

444 ms

home_interactive_offerbox_sep.png

home_interactive_offerbox_sep.png

445 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrc.woff

51 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrc.woff

68 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrc.woff

123 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrc.woff

123 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrc.woff

123 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

49 ms

mfn-icons.woff

mfn-icons.woff

358 ms

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJg.woff

1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDrMfJg.woff

82 ms

collect

collect

19 ms

js

js

107 ms

K-anAykvQgACUTybJcgNBXgugx_5IzEk.jpg

K-anAykvQgACUTybJcgNBXgugx_5IzEk.jpg

636 ms

hjKphcu-JYaUE1JTMe_dhpJBQD4_vZuW.jpg

hjKphcu-JYaUE1JTMe_dhpJBQD4_vZuW.jpg

429 ms

TNwx5ojVFB3RRGJF7ILGFbss6IquzCbB.jpg

TNwx5ojVFB3RRGJF7ILGFbss6IquzCbB.jpg

443 ms

kachara2.jpg

kachara2.jpg

572 ms

logo.png

logo.png

443 ms

rpltechnologyservices.com

rpltechnologyservices.com

847 ms

rpltechnologyservices.com

rpltechnologyservices.com

1326 ms

Accessibility Review

rpltechnologyservices.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

rpltechnologyservices.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

rpltechnologyservices.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpltechnologyservices.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rpltechnologyservices.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rpltechnologyservices.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RPL Technology Services. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: