Tools & Wizards About Us
rpm-boston.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 34

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    54% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

rpm-boston.com

Real Property Management in Boston, MA | Customized Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

45 ms

Resources Loaded

967 ms

Page Rendered

425 ms

rpm-boston.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rpm-boston.com homepage info - get ready to check Rpm Boston best content right away, or after learning these important things about rpm-boston.com

Boost your profits by hiring Real Property Management in Boston, MA. Contact us to discuss the advantages of our property management services in depth.

Visit rpm-boston.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rpm-boston.com page load time and found that the first response time was 45 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rpm-boston.com performance score

34

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,540 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.147

76/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rpm-boston.com

45 ms

www.rpm-boston.com

67 ms

www.rpm-boston.com

128 ms

vhe7nhn.css

34 ms

css

35 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Rpm-boston.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to D3ssz1uz7feir2.cloudfront.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (581 ms) relates to the external source Player.vimeo.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 441.2 kB (43%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

579.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rpm-boston.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 476.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 226.2 kB

  • Original 276.1 kB
  • After minification 263.0 kB
  • After compression 49.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.2 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 64.2 kB
  • After minification 53.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rpm Boston needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 201.3 kB

  • Original 476.9 kB
  • After minification 476.4 kB
  • After compression 275.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 201.3 kB or 42% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 203.1 kB
  • After minification 201.0 kB
  • After compression 200.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpm-boston.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 57 (72%)

Requests Now

79

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpm Boston. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rpm-boston.com

rpm-boston.com

45 ms

www.rpm-boston.com

www.rpm-boston.com

67 ms

www.rpm-boston.com

www.rpm-boston.com

128 ms

vhe7nhn.css

vhe7nhn.css

34 ms

css

css

35 ms

css

css

42 ms

launch-d15436fe16ed.min.js

launch-d15436fe16ed.min.js

58 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

24 ms

styles.css

styles.css

31 ms

dwyr-rpm-public.css

dwyr-rpm-public.css

34 ms

nivo-lightbox.css

nivo-lightbox.css

29 ms

default.css

default.css

50 ms

css

css

35 ms

public.css

public.css

30 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

83 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

48 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

49 ms

dwyr-rpm-public.js

dwyr-rpm-public.js

47 ms

nivo-lightbox.min.js

nivo-lightbox.min.js

48 ms

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

jquery.touchSwipe.min.js

50 ms

script.js

script.js

55 ms

gf.placeholders.js

gf.placeholders.js

55 ms

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-reset.min.css

78 ms

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-foundation.min.css

78 ms

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

gravity-forms-theme-framework.min.css

79 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

80 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

159 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

163 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

162 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

170 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

178 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

182 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

183 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

183 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

182 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

182 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

182 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

199 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

205 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

204 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

204 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

219 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

198 ms

p.css

p.css

24 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

283 ms

AppMeasurement.min.js

AppMeasurement.min.js

109 ms

AppMeasurement_Module_ActivityMap.min.js

AppMeasurement_Module_ActivityMap.min.js

132 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

297 ms

RPM-4C-Boston-213x120.png

RPM-4C-Boston-213x120.png

234 ms

101972217

101972217

362 ms

52548985

52548985

581 ms

arrow_right1.svg

arrow_right1.svg

253 ms

RPM-Homepage_Default-Split.webp

RPM-Homepage_Default-Split.webp

212 ms

RPM_WO-Logo_plain-450x203.1.webp

RPM_WO-Logo_plain-450x203.1.webp

209 ms

RPM_WO-Logo_plain-500x226.png

RPM_WO-Logo_plain-500x226.png

199 ms

done-right-promise-logo.webp

done-right-promise-logo.webp

210 ms

map.webp

map.webp

210 ms

RPM_NBLY_white_footer.png

RPM_NBLY_white_footer.png

210 ms

equal_housing_opportunity_logo-02.png

equal_housing_opportunity_logo-02.png

212 ms

equalhousing.webp

equalhousing.webp

212 ms

gototop.webp

gototop.webp

233 ms

rpm-neighborly-logo-white.png

rpm-neighborly-logo-white.png

146 ms

sprite-image-48.svg

sprite-image-48.svg

150 ms

upper-owners.png

upper-owners.png

149 ms

upper-phone.png

upper-phone.png

149 ms

chevron.png

chevron.png

149 ms

rpm-logo-corporate.webp

rpm-logo-corporate.webp

189 ms

neighborly_logo.png

neighborly_logo.png

208 ms

apple_logo.svg

apple_logo.svg

281 ms

google_play.svg

google_play.svg

321 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwA.ttf

191 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKA.ttf

217 ms

rd

rd

112 ms

menu.js

menu.js

142 ms

js

js

256 ms

d

d

35 ms

Allura-Regular.woff

Allura-Regular.woff

56 ms

dest5.html

dest5.html

97 ms

id

id

97 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

61 ms

ibs:dpid=411&dpuuid=Zu9unQAAAHRfnAOH

ibs:dpid=411&dpuuid=Zu9unQAAAHRfnAOH

69 ms

upper-search.png

upper-search.png

23 ms

upper-tenants.png

upper-tenants.png

77 ms

s49825845290906

s49825845290906

13 ms

api.js

api.js

12 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

26 ms

rpm-gforms-style-overrides.css

rpm-gforms-style-overrides.css

33 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

35 ms

Accessibility Review

rpm-boston.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best Practices

rpm-boston.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

rpm-boston.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpm-boston.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpm-boston.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rpm-boston.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rpm Boston. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: