Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    65% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    34% of websites

rpm.org

rpm.org - Home

Page Load Speed

8 sec in total

First Response

370 ms

Resources Loaded

7.5 sec

Page Rendered

128 ms

rpm.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Rpm content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about rpm.org

Visit rpm.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Rpm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 370 ms and then it took 7.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rpm.org performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.2 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rpm.org

370 ms

trac.css

243 ms

wiki.css

362 ms

trac.js

891 ms

code.css

85 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Rpm.org, 8% (1 request) were made to Yum.baseurl.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) relates to the external source Yum.baseurl.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.7 kB (57%)

Content Size

37.7 kB

After Optimization

16.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Rpm.org main page is 37.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 18.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 6.0 kB

  • Original 9.0 kB
  • After minification 8.9 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 6.0 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 10.3 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Rpm needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 18.4 kB
  • After minification 15.0 kB
  • After compression 4.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpm.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

10

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rpm. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

rpm.org accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rpm.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

rpm.org SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpm.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rpm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: