Tools & Wizards About Us
rpmel.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

rpmel.com

RPM Event Logistics Limited - Specialist Event Logistics

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

199 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

359 ms

rpmel.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to rpmel.com homepage info - get ready to check RPM El best content right away, or after learning these important things about rpmel.com

RPM Event Logistics is a specialist Freight Forwarder dedicated to providing professional Logistics Services and Management within the Events Industries.

Visit rpmel.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rpmel.com page load time and found that the first response time was 199 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rpmel.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rpmel.com

199 ms

wpstyles.css

97 ms

jquery.js

218 ms

jquery.wputils.js

185 ms

jquery.event.move.js

185 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Rpmel.com, 21% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rpmel.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 154.4 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rpmel.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 32.4 kB
  • After minification 30.9 kB
  • After compression 6.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 25.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 128.3 kB

  • Original 3.5 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. RPM El images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 121 B

  • Original 47.8 kB
  • After minification 47.8 kB
  • After compression 47.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 416 B
  • After minification 416 B
  • After compression 379 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rpmel.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (33%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

31

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of RPM El. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rpmel.com

rpmel.com

199 ms

wpstyles.css

wpstyles.css

97 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

218 ms

jquery.wputils.js

jquery.wputils.js

185 ms

jquery.event.move.js

jquery.event.move.js

185 ms

jquery.event.swipe.js

jquery.event.swipe.js

187 ms

jquery.wpslider.js

jquery.wpslider.js

186 ms

jquery.wplightbox.js

jquery.wplightbox.js

204 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

107 ms

wp7f803add.png

wp7f803add.png

94 ms

wpc9186f03_05_06.jpg

wpc9186f03_05_06.jpg

439 ms

wp84748c3d_06.png

wp84748c3d_06.png

95 ms

wp75101fb8.png

wp75101fb8.png

98 ms

wp1fcc1368_05_06.jpg

wp1fcc1368_05_06.jpg

189 ms

wp568ad3a1_05_06.jpg

wp568ad3a1_05_06.jpg

256 ms

wp332f5198_05_06.jpg

wp332f5198_05_06.jpg

272 ms

wp7cb84e7b_05_06.jpg

wp7cb84e7b_05_06.jpg

278 ms

wp14e85876_05_06.jpg

wp14e85876_05_06.jpg

278 ms

wp78bd7ab3_05_06.jpg

wp78bd7ab3_05_06.jpg

449 ms

wp10d466a7_05_06.jpg

wp10d466a7_05_06.jpg

440 ms

wp4ed6241d_05_06.jpg

wp4ed6241d_05_06.jpg

448 ms

wp36161cd6_05_06.jpg

wp36161cd6_05_06.jpg

458 ms

wpdf2d4397_06.png

wpdf2d4397_06.png

373 ms

wp624a8435.png

wp624a8435.png

467 ms

wp6168c58f_06.png

wp6168c58f_06.png

530 ms

wp3c6481d5_06.png

wp3c6481d5_06.png

538 ms

wpf8037d4d_05_06.jpg

wpf8037d4d_05_06.jpg

978 ms

wpb3d63e5f_05_06.jpg

wpb3d63e5f_05_06.jpg

898 ms

wp0d05c3bd_05_06.jpg

wp0d05c3bd_05_06.jpg

991 ms

wpaf9b0202_05_06.jpg

wpaf9b0202_05_06.jpg

1539 ms

wp33678fcf_06.png

wp33678fcf_06.png

621 ms

wp3a781309.png

wp3a781309.png

632 ms

wp1a65d691_05_06.jpg

wp1a65d691_05_06.jpg

716 ms

wpbd7a894f_06.png

wpbd7a894f_06.png

721 ms

wpb3105f09_06.png

wpb3105f09_06.png

803 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

64 ms

wpcc08772a.ttf

wpcc08772a.ttf

975 ms

wpeaf46f6c.ttf

wpeaf46f6c.ttf

968 ms

wp97dcfe41.ttf

wp97dcfe41.ttf

1149 ms

wp21868e81.ttf

wp21868e81.ttf

1142 ms

wp72541b78.ttf

wp72541b78.ttf

1541 ms

wp400d3354.ttf

wp400d3354.ttf

1764 ms

settings

settings

98 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

26 ms

RPM_EVENTLOG

RPM_EVENTLOG

65 ms

polyfills-3b821eda8863adcc4a4b.js

polyfills-3b821eda8863adcc4a4b.js

26 ms

runtime-a697c5a1ae32bd7e4d42.js

runtime-a697c5a1ae32bd7e4d42.js

51 ms

modules.20f98d7498a59035a762.js

modules.20f98d7498a59035a762.js

97 ms

main-fd9ef5eb169057cda26d.js

main-fd9ef5eb169057cda26d.js

78 ms

_app-88bf420a57d49e33be53.js

_app-88bf420a57d49e33be53.js

90 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-c33f0b02841cffc3e9b4.js

%5BscreenName%5D-c33f0b02841cffc3e9b4.js

90 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

92 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

96 ms

Accessibility Review

rpmel.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

rpmel.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rpmel.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rpmel.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rpmel.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rpmel.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of RPM El. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: