Tools & Wizards About Us
rprojectinc.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 61

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

rprojectinc.com

R Project Incorporated -A Leading Luxury Travel Marketing Company-

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

551 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

121 ms

rprojectinc.com screenshot

About Website

Visit rprojectinc.com now to see the best up-to-date R Project Inc content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rprojectinc.com

Japan's leading luxury Tourism Marketing Company runs an original pioneering brand of Japanese Ryokan, THE RYOKAN COLLECTION and Marketing and Sales Representation for International hotel brand and ex...

Visit rprojectinc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Rprojectinc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

rprojectinc.com performance score

61

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.7 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value90 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

rprojectinc.com

551 ms

superslides.css

168 ms

layout.css

344 ms

css

20 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

384 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Rprojectinc.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Rprojectinc.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 39.5 kB (1%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Rprojectinc.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 16.9 kB

  • Original 22.8 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.9 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 17.0 kB

  • Original 3.2 MB
  • After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. R Project Inc images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 50.6 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 47.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 2.3 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 5.5 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rprojectinc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (30%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

26

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of R Project Inc. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

rprojectinc.com

rprojectinc.com

551 ms

superslides.css

superslides.css

168 ms

layout.css

layout.css

344 ms

css

css

20 ms

perfect-scrollbar.css

perfect-scrollbar.css

384 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

9 ms

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

jquery-1.8.2.min.js

7 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

382 ms

jquery.animate-enhanced.min.js

jquery.animate-enhanced.min.js

383 ms

hammer.min.js

hammer.min.js

407 ms

jquery.superslides.js

jquery.superslides.js

405 ms

application.js

application.js

509 ms

jquery.mousewheel.js

jquery.mousewheel.js

575 ms

perfect-scrollbar.js

perfect-scrollbar.js

580 ms

header01.gif

header01.gif

170 ms

line01.gif

line01.gif

194 ms

header02.gif

header02.gif

194 ms

header03.gif

header03.gif

214 ms

header04.gif

header04.gif

193 ms

header07.gif

header07.gif

205 ms

line02.gif

line02.gif

335 ms

header08.gif

header08.gif

388 ms

header09.gif

header09.gif

388 ms

header10.gif

header10.gif

390 ms

header11.gif

header11.gif

401 ms

01_01base.jpg

01_01base.jpg

1191 ms

01_02base.jpg

01_02base.jpg

1163 ms

01_03base.jpg

01_03base.jpg

1534 ms

01_04base.jpg

01_04base.jpg

1522 ms

02_base.jpg

02_base.jpg

1376 ms

03_base.jpg

03_base.jpg

1578 ms

06_base.jpg

06_base.jpg

1362 ms

07_base.jpg

07_base.jpg

1780 ms

08_base.jpg

08_base.jpg

1566 ms

next.gif

next.gif

1569 ms

back.gif

back.gif

1715 ms

t5t9IRIUKY-TFF_LW5lnMR3v2DnvYtiWfT8b.ttf

t5t9IRIUKY-TFF_LW5lnMR3v2DnvYtiWfT8b.ttf

7 ms

t5t9IRIUKY-TFF_LW5lnMR3v2DnvPNiWfT8b.ttf

t5t9IRIUKY-TFF_LW5lnMR3v2DnvPNiWfT8b.ttf

11 ms

t5t9IRIUKY-TFF_LW5lnMR3v2Dnvhd-WfT8b.ttf

t5t9IRIUKY-TFF_LW5lnMR3v2Dnvhd-WfT8b.ttf

42 ms

header01_on.gif

header01_on.gif

1632 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1130 ms

Accessibility Review

rprojectinc.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

rprojectinc.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

rprojectinc.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rprojectinc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rprojectinc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

rprojectinc.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of R Project Inc. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: