9.1 sec in total
1.7 sec
7.1 sec
297 ms
Visit rrb.by now to see the best up-to-date Rrb content for Belarus and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rrb.by
Сайт РРБ-Банк. Отделения банка в Минске, Гомеле, Витебске, Бобруйске, Гродно, Молодечно. Кредиты, вклады, депозиты для физических и юридических лиц, ИП
Visit rrb.byWe analyzed Rrb.by page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 7.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
rrb.by performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.1 s
0/100
10%
Value48.8 s
0/100
25%
Value29.3 s
0/100
10%
Value5,060 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.082
94/100
15%
Value57.3 s
0/100
10%
1708 ms
180 ms
335 ms
513 ms
532 ms
Our browser made a total of 124 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Rrb.by, 10% (13 requests) were made to Vk.com and 3% (4 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Rrb.by.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (35%)
3.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Rrb.by main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 68.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rrb images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 916.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 916.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rrb.by needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 172.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (75%)
106
27
The browser has sent 106 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rrb. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rrb.by
1708 ms
style.css
180 ms
style_bg.css
335 ms
jquery.js
513 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
532 ms
JSglobal.js
345 ms
functions_ajax.js
350 ms
jsONLOAD.js
521 ms
default.css
525 ms
default.js
548 ms
default.js
686 ms
default.css
713 ms
default.css
696 ms
default.css
707 ms
default.js
981 ms
default.css
845 ms
default.js
871 ms
default.css
872 ms
default.js
886 ms
default.css
904 ms
default.js
1005 ms
default.css
1049 ms
default.js
1037 ms
default.css
1056 ms
default.js
1092 ms
default.css
1157 ms
default.js
1163 ms
default.css
1195 ms
default.css
1231 ms
default.js
1268 ms
default.css
1317 ms
openapi.js
387 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
fotorama.css
1190 ms
jquery-ui.css
1047 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
1295 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
1351 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
1589 ms
media.css
1153 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.css
1370 ms
style.css
1449 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
1378 ms
default.js
1361 ms
fotorama.js
1524 ms
jquery-ui.js
2038 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
1630 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
1741 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
1911 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
2009 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
1946 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.21.custom.min.js
2010 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
1889 ms
jquery.easing-1.4.pack.js
2108 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
1977 ms
ga.js
29 ms
main.png
1003 ms
mainDecor3.png
372 ms
cap.gif
180 ms
bgDecor.png
272 ms
search.png
272 ms
big.png
352 ms
main.png
507 ms
cap-icons.png
446 ms
c.png
459 ms
arrow.png
532 ms
c.png
539 ms
icon.png
607 ms
bg.png
629 ms
arrows.gif
679 ms
53.png
1687 ms
52.png
1536 ms
37.png
1920 ms
44.png
1911 ms
54.jpg
1348 ms
11.png
1183 ms
22.png
1344 ms
62.png
1678 ms
59.png
1683 ms
49.png
1705 ms
53.png
1842 ms
49.png
2003 ms
57.png
1847 ms
59.png
1866 ms
ch_card.png
2179 ms
arrow2.png
2029 ms
arrow.png
2031 ms
usd.gif
2088 ms
todown.gif
2132 ms
upload.gif
130 ms
__utm.gif
25 ms
widget_poll.php
267 ms
watch.js
217 ms
eur.gif
2109 ms
rub.gif
2132 ms
c.png
2049 ms
79 ms
toright.png
2061 ms
watch.js
465 ms
21 ms
bg.gif
2253 ms
line.gif
2083 ms
38 ms
31 ms
rustyle.css
257 ms
common.js
304 ms
lang3_0.js
263 ms
widgets.css
263 ms
xdm.js
264 ms
poll.js
264 ms
ui_controls.css
384 ms
ui_controls.js
641 ms
silver.gif
2008 ms
1.gif
2036 ms
2.gif
1965 ms
vkontakte.png
2020 ms
facebook.png
2030 ms
1.png
2012 ms
footer.gif
2061 ms
toLeft.png
1985 ms
toRight.png
2008 ms
advert.gif
90 ms
1
90 ms
widget_logo.gif
130 ms
radio.gif
132 ms
rrb.by accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
rrb.by best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
rrb.by SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrb.by can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Rrb.by main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
rrb.by
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Rrb. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: