5.7 sec in total
1.2 sec
4 sec
441 ms
Visit rrfac.com now to see the best up-to-date Rrfac content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about rrfac.com
The podiatrists & orthopedic doctors at Rock River Foot and Ankle Clinic in Watertown and Fort Atkinson specialize in treatment of foot and ankle problems, deformities and arthritic conditions, includ...
Visit rrfac.comWe analyzed Rrfac.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
rrfac.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value5.6 s
17/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value1,230 ms
20/100
30%
Value0.234
53/100
15%
Value8.5 s
37/100
10%
1195 ms
93 ms
43 ms
70 ms
154 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Rrfac.com, 23% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Rrfac.com.
Page size can be reduced by 126.2 kB (10%)
1.2 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Rrfac.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 677.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 103.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 103.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Rrfac images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 7.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Rrfac.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (58%)
45
19
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Rrfac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
rrfac.com
1195 ms
js
93 ms
style.min.css
43 ms
settings.css
70 ms
full-styles.6.1.5.css
154 ms
mkhb-render.css
74 ms
mkhb-row.css
75 ms
mkhb-column.css
74 ms
js_composer.min.css
179 ms
theme-options-production-1705353059.css
122 ms
style.css
125 ms
webfontloader.js
126 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
126 ms
jquery.js
149 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
148 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
208 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
208 ms
css
31 ms
font-awesome.css
194 ms
font-awesome.min.css
195 ms
full-scripts.6.1.5.js
294 ms
mkhb-render.js
195 ms
mkhb-column.js
242 ms
wp-embed.min.js
242 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
242 ms
skrollr.min.js
240 ms
js
117 ms
analytics.js
110 ms
css
52 ms
collect
56 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk5hkWVAexQ.ttf
47 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf
620 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk_RkWVAexQ.ttf
622 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkxhjWVAexQ.ttf
626 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0RkyFjWVAexQ.ttf
625 ms
memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk0ZjWVAexQ.ttf
625 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
625 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
625 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
624 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
626 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
626 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
625 ms
rock-river-foot-_-ankle-clinic-03b-copy.png
607 ms
rrfac-people-walking.jpg
600 ms
rrfac-running.jpg
600 ms
rrfac-family-walking.jpg
608 ms
dummy-transparent-o0pkiqmrcy892ykh3brax8fz10nqooalustpw8swxq.png
597 ms
rock-river-foot-and-ankle-fort-bldg.jpg
598 ms
map-temp2.jpg
563 ms
healthy_feet_rrfac.jpg
564 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
172 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
174 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
175 ms
brent-yaeggi.jpg
150 ms
greg-graglia.jpg
152 ms
daniel-f-elmes-2.jpg
150 ms
rock-river-foot-ankle-x-ray.jpg
150 ms
loader.gif
30 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
20 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
49 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
72 ms
rrfac.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
rrfac.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
rrfac.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Rrfac.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Rrfac.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
rrfac.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Rrfac. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: